From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29452 invoked by alias); 4 Jun 2014 13:41:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29441 invoked by uid 89); 4 Jun 2014 13:41:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout29.012.net.il Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il (HELO mtaout29.012.net.il) (80.179.55.185) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 13:41:42 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N6N00L00C60G300@mtaout29.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 16:42:06 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N6N00L4SCQ58Q50@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Wed, 04 Jun 2014 16:42:06 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 13:41:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v3] Demangler crash handler In-reply-to: <20140604133603.GC10121@blade.nx> To: Gary Benson Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, aburgess@broadcom.com, xdje42@gmail.com, fw@deneb.enyo.de, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, palves@redhat.com, tromey@redhat.com Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83sink7pww.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20140604100755.GA7570@blade.nx> <20140604100957.GC7570@blade.nx> <834n017z8w.fsf@gnu.org> <20140604133603.GC10121@blade.nx> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-06/txt/msg00163.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 14:36:03 +0100 > From: Gary Benson > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, aburgess@broadcom.com, xdje42@gmail.com, > fw@deneb.enyo.de, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl, palves@redhat.com, > tromey@redhat.com > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > From: Gary Benson > > > > > > Eli pointed out that SIGSEGV is an ANSI-standard signal but I > > > found various other SIGSEGV checks in GDB > > > > They should all be removed. > > Ok, I'll do this. Should I commit the change as obvious? I think so, yes.