From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B61DA382DCC3 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 14:19:00 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org B61DA382DCC3 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53852) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oZCBD-0003wP-Sr; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 10:18:56 -0400 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1555 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oZCBD-00089x-5Y; Fri, 16 Sep 2022 10:18:55 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 17:18:52 +0300 Message-Id: <83tu572yib.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: "Willgerodt, Felix" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, markus.t.metzger@intel.com In-Reply-To: (felix.willgerodt@intel.com) Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/10] btrace: Introduce auxiliary instructions. References: <20220916113646.49749-1-felix.willgerodt@intel.com> <20220916113646.49749-2-felix.willgerodt@intel.com> <837d234k59.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 14:19:01 -0000 > From: "Willgerodt, Felix" > CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , "Metzger, > Markus T" > Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 14:01:57 +0000 > > Thanks for reviewing this again. > In the cover letter I mentioned that basically all doc parts have already been > approved by you. As I didn't want to waste your time, having you review the > same text again and again. Is there a better way to let you know that you > approved this already? Or did you read the cover letter and intentionally reviewed it? > (Which is totally fine.) I guess I missed that part, sorry. And I didn't remember reviewing this.