From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [209.51.188.92]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 094063857C62 for ; Fri, 7 Jan 2022 16:33:11 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 094063857C62 Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=46888 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n5sAw-0006Xh-78; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 11:33:10 -0500 Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3310 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n5sAv-000745-UI; Fri, 07 Jan 2022 11:33:10 -0500 Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 18:33:05 +0200 Message-Id: <83tuef4ibi.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Simon Marchi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <20220107152921.2858909-3-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> (message from Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches on Fri, 7 Jan 2022 10:29:21 -0500) Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] gdb/python: drop support for Python < 3.4 References: <20220107152921.2858909-1-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> <20220107152921.2858909-3-simon.marchi@polymtl.ca> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2022 16:33:13 -0000 > Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2022 10:29:21 -0500 > From: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches > > Python 3 versions <= 3.3 are quite old and not likely to be used > nowadays. Dropping support for them allows us to remove some hacks and > compatibility macros that depend on the Python version being < 3.4. Are there real reasons to drop those old versions? I mean, does supporting them causes us some real maintenance burden? > We could go even further and document that we only support versions 3.5 > or 3.6 and up, for example, but that wouldn't change the code. That'd mean dropping support for Windows XP, as AFAIU 3.4 is the last one which supports it.