public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Cc: aburgess@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Introducing a GDB Code Of Conduct
Date: Sun, 03 Dec 2023 08:40:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83v89f7prn.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZWv1eOG5UAfYYnEp@vapier> (message from Mike Frysinger on Sat, 2 Dec 2023 22:26:48 -0500)

> Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 22:26:48 -0500
> From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> On 30 Nov 2023 15:59, Andrew Burgess wrote:
> > Many GNU toolchain projects have adopted a Code of Conduct (CoC)
> > recently, and I believe that GDB should do likewise.
> 
> adopting a CoC sounds fine, but really seems like we should be using the
> same one across them.  there isn't anything in the content that screams
> "this only makes sense for XXX project".  can't we do this akin to how
> we merge changes from "upstream" gcc tree ?
> 
> yes, i know there are a few things inline like "here's the gdb e-mail",
> but that should be fairly trivial to summarize at the beginning/end, or
> ideally in a sep file altogether to make merging trivial.

I would object to adopting the GCC CoC because it has some parts that
I cannot live with, as a member of the GDB project and a global
maintainer.  That's why I wrote the GDB CoC in the first place, and
the differences are not trivial, at least to me, and are not limited
to the email addresses.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-12-03  6:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-11-30 15:59 Andrew Burgess
2023-12-03  3:15 ` Kevin Buettner
2023-12-03  3:26 ` Mike Frysinger
2023-12-03  6:40   ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2023-12-04 15:49   ` Andrew Burgess
2023-12-04  9:27 ` Guinevere Larsen
2023-12-04 17:50 ` John Baldwin
2023-12-22 11:24 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-12-22 16:57   ` Guinevere Larsen
2023-12-22 19:39   ` Mike Frysinger
2024-04-05 20:32   ` Guinevere Larsen
2024-04-08 10:35     ` Andrew Burgess

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83v89f7prn.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=aburgess@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).