From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0D733858D1E for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2023 12:03:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org B0D733858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qGIGq-0003KR-T1; Mon, 03 Jul 2023 08:03:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=hkyus1sHbd3Rp6QmvUwpa2UFcm1FpOMp6wFWkIUJJ+I=; b=iBzb1rhhDL35 xwvj0DFwUh0e7vG3VA/izDXHCKdtNi/g7868pudfwYjXmTFKL3Oa1Oj/n/75KKkmERXId093VbgG2 IqV4tbcxPz1Vb8jlJ6hmxJ41k9WEXGpix4Qw3xmf7SKLHJuMxYHVasVeTKSWm8kZLUhsTKcWYN4hw e1ZDu1darMMOcA8O7uFoV0U2WQ44D+HsFccM3vg1gAagsry8x7w/zo7LTX1dTvksL+vJBgt+JV4nk X6R6gtXiIBu990vU3LPYbIDretRhvf0/Au7w5iDIT8gGkX6tGr8MZdoe5TFxYRh+xrYMiBoPO+Z7o 8ZTomZTLVhzERCoqcBxPGQ==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qGIGo-0001lG-Kh; Mon, 03 Jul 2023 08:03:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2023 15:03:43 +0300 Message-Id: <83v8f1mcbk.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Luis Machado Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <8eaf8d52-3814-bf9c-2c4b-dc2b5b0eae62@arm.com> (message from Luis Machado on Mon, 3 Jul 2023 10:52:34 +0100) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/16] [gdb/docs] sme: Document SME registers and features References: <20230630134616.1238105-1-luis.machado@arm.com> <20230630134616.1238105-17-luis.machado@arm.com> <83fs68qa7x.fsf@gnu.org> <8eaf8d52-3814-bf9c-2c4b-dc2b5b0eae62@arm.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 10:52:34 +0100 > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > From: Luis Machado > > > Please use @command{gdbserver} instead of @code. > > > > Is this the convention? I see 123 matches for @code{gdbserver}, but only 32 for > @command{gdbserver}. It's a convention, but it is relatively recent, and I didn't see a need to convert all of the existing uses of @code to mean a program (although such a patch will be welcome, if someone wants to do it).