From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 66481 invoked by alias); 3 Mar 2020 20:28:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 66473 invoked by uid 89); 3 Mar 2020 20:28:33 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=intelligent X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (209.51.188.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 20:28:32 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37690) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j9E9V-0006nw-ET; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 15:28:29 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3337 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1j9E9U-00045J-6H; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 15:28:28 -0500 Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 20:28:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83wo81w5cu.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Simon Marchi Cc: ssbssa@yahoo.de, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <4b854f69-10ea-eada-f4ba-245a02aae2e6@simark.ca> (message from Simon Marchi on Tue, 3 Mar 2020 14:36:53 -0500) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement debugging of WOW64 processes References: <20200303182057.8973-1-ssbssa.ref@yahoo.de> <20200303182057.8973-1-ssbssa@yahoo.de> <834kv5xoef.fsf@gnu.org> <1055408447.6034972.1583262721877@mail.yahoo.com> <83y2shw81q.fsf@gnu.org> <4b854f69-10ea-eada-f4ba-245a02aae2e6@simark.ca> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-03/txt/msg00070.txt > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > From: Simon Marchi > Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 14:36:53 -0500 > > Eli, just wondering, did you review the code parts of this patch? I've read it, yes. I cannot say I know this area of Windows APIs well enough to say something intelligent, though. If the patch was tested with 32-bit programs, I think it's OK.