From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 97284 invoked by alias); 12 Jun 2017 16:44:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 97267 invoked by uid 89); 12 Jun 2017 16:44:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=disputes, policy X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (208.118.235.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 16:44:48 +0000 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dKSSO-0005tR-E9 for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 12:44:51 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:51848) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dKSSO-0005tJ-AC; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 12:44:48 -0400 Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3567 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1dKSSN-0003cJ-Bb; Mon, 12 Jun 2017 12:44:47 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 16:44:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83wp8h40lo.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Simon Marchi CC: qiyaoltc@gmail.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: <93eb64489ac9d53665a144ddf5a966d5@polymtl.ca> (message from Simon Marchi on Mon, 12 Jun 2017 17:54:42 +0200) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Remove a few hurdles of compiling with clang Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <1497124689-11842-1-git-send-email-simon.marchi@ericsson.com> <83tw3n5jyk.fsf@gnu.org> <86tw3labb0.fsf@gmail.com> <83a85d5l4n.fsf@gnu.org> <93eb64489ac9d53665a144ddf5a966d5@polymtl.ca> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2017-06/txt/msg00334.txt.bz2 > Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 17:54:42 +0200 > From: Simon Marchi > Cc: Yao Qi , simon.marchi@ericsson.com, > gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > I included in this patchset the changes that I think improve the > situation with Clang, but are neutral to GCC, so I don't think these > should pose any problem. Yes, I know. > But I think it's a good thing to discuss how far we're willing to go to > make GDB build cleanly with Clang, because some other issues are not so > easily resolved. That's precisely the reason why I raised this: it would be good to have a clear policy on this, to avoid the need for unnecessary work and unnecessary disputes. (I actually hoped we already did have such a policy, but if not, I think we should try to come up with it.) Thanks.