From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-72726-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 23914 invoked by alias); 2 May 2010 17:38:24 -0000
Received: (qmail 23904 invoked by uid 22791); 2 May 2010 17:38:23 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=5.0	tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il (HELO mtaout22.012.net.il) (80.179.55.172)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sun, 02 May 2010 17:38:14 +0000
Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0L1S00M00ZL9H500@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Sun, 02 May 2010 20:37:30 +0300 (IDT)
Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.59.39]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0L1S00IX0ZMHB590@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sun, 02 May 2010 20:37:30 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Sun, 02 May 2010 17:38:00 -0000
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: gdb/PROBLEMS ?
In-reply-to: <201005021726.19409.pedro@codesourcery.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Message-id: <83wrvmurvl.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <201005021726.19409.pedro@codesourcery.com>
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-05/txt/msg00019.txt.bz2

> From: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 17:26:19 +0100
> 
> I looked over the described problems in gdb/PROBLEMS, and, it looks
> to me that all of them fall in one of two categories: either
> they've been fixed already, or aren't worth mentioning here.
> Anyone wants to double check, or believes otherwise?  I'll
> be happy to adjust the patch.
> 
> After the patch, all that's left is:
> =======================================================================
> 
> 			Known problems in GDB 7.1.50
> 
> 		See also: http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/
> 
> None worth mentioning here.

FWIW, I'm okay with this.