From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 90732 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2015 13:59:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 90720 invoked by uid 89); 22 Apr 2015 13:59:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_20,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mtaout20.012.net.il Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il (HELO mtaout20.012.net.il) (80.179.55.166) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:59:29 +0000 Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NN700700NR0VY00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for gdb-patches@sourceware.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 16:59:26 +0300 (IDT) Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NN7007WXO72PE50@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 16:59:26 +0300 (IDT) Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 13:59:00 -0000 From: Eli Zaretskii Subject: Re: 3 weeks to GDB 7.9.1 release? In-reply-to: <20150422133231.GB4764@adacore.com> To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii Message-id: <83y4lk2ria.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20150422133231.GB4764@adacore.com> X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-04/txt/msg00820.txt.bz2 > Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 06:32:31 -0700 > From: Joel Brobecker > > Planned date for 7.9.1 re-spin is Wed May, 13th. It appears that > it's been a fairly smooth sailing for the gdb-7.9-branch since > GDB 7.9 was released... Our release wiki page > (https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/GDB_7.9_Release) shows that only > one issue was fixed, and we only have 1 that has been identified > as blocking: > > [Doug?] PR18066 argument "word" seems broken in Command.complete > (text, word) > > Anything else that should be seen as blocking for 7.9.1? Not really blocking, but would someone please help me get these annoyances fixed upstream, so that I don't need to continue fixing them in every GDB release? http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2015-03/msg00115.html TIA