public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 02/36] Guile extension language: doc additions
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 14:41:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83y52vvmga.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k3egez8e.fsf@gnu.org>

> From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 12:57:21 +0100
> 
> > What about long double support?
> 
> Guile doesn’t support it out of the box.
> 
> If needed, it could easily be implemented as an extension: one would use
> a SMOB to wrap long doubles and pass them to Scheme, and possibly define
> methods for ‘+’, ‘-’, etc. for objects of this type.
> 
> Of course, this wouldn’t be terribly efficient, but that’s not so
> important here I think; what matters is that it would allow ‘long
> double’ values to be passed around without loss of accuracy.
> 
> That said, my feeling is that leaving things as is (with long doubles
> cast to doubles) may prove to be sufficient for most practical uses of
> GDB.
> 
> WDYT?

Well, GDB supports long double if the target does, so I thought it
would be a pity to lose that when working with Guile.  But maybe I
misunderstand something, and this isn't a real problem.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-04 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-24 19:03 Doug Evans
2013-12-25 19:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-01-03 21:31   ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-01-04  7:12     ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-01-04 11:57       ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-01-04 14:41         ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2014-01-04 17:42           ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-01-04 20:00             ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-01-16  4:20               ` Doug Evans
2014-01-18 20:36         ` Doug Evans
2014-01-18 20:52           ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-01-18 20:55             ` Doug Evans
2014-01-19 16:58               ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-01-19 17:19                 ` Doug Evans
2014-01-19 17:34                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-01-19 17:53                     ` Doug Evans
2014-01-19 18:10                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-01-19 21:19                         ` Doug Evans
2014-01-18 20:16     ` Doug Evans
2014-01-18 20:42       ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-01-18 21:57         ` Doug Evans
2014-01-19 14:46           ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-01-19 21:37             ` Doug Evans
2014-01-19 22:50               ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-01-18 22:32     ` Doug Evans
2014-01-19 14:47       ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-01-19 15:56         ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-01-19 16:13           ` Ludovic Courtès
2014-01-19 17:05             ` Doug Evans
2014-01-18 20:06   ` Doug Evans
2014-01-18 20:24     ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-01-18 20:53       ` Doug Evans
2014-01-19 16:57         ` Eli Zaretskii
2014-01-19 17:42           ` Doug Evans
2014-01-19 21:01           ` Doug Evans

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83y52vvmga.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=ludo@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).