From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 250453858D35 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2023 16:10:07 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 250453858D35 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pEBlm-0000wA-01; Sat, 07 Jan 2023 11:10:06 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=kbWbutBX+p7t7LG9IEXWFtCSnPQ5/uFfPRACHfL0wgg=; b=avM0y2Xm65Ir iIV6H/n8bL9cCXVyqNSBnnvfbJZ2zw9ptkTFo38DJCIr6OHBeume/RJsHoYwUGYjE2781AQRIZ+WU mvgsRLpQJRMzRCiUQULislux6flFIij1v4503wvKA3tmXhmuUvmQKbzoUAS54Ryg0DSFWUUVppaVt urwxHEs1qowojOdg+9UpfJKLRH74D14HcJY3I4obHl2S+fsBs9RKQh3vD8AhwvvPm8wzKP/6bgOWs bPz2P9y6TRutYhlsdYEbuS/bH4iT6CbB69479q2vDakgnXoDqdasLp2snytgMrnIt2139jGsaXHYA q/gKCPV68wGroDKb/wQLjw==; Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pEBll-0003uO-G8; Sat, 07 Jan 2023 11:10:05 -0500 Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2023 18:10:26 +0200 Message-Id: <83zgauqqa5.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Andreas Schwab Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <87zgaufj4w.fsf@igel.home> (message from Andreas Schwab on Sat, 07 Jan 2023 16:40:15 +0100) Subject: Re: Two observations using GDB 13 snapshot References: <83h6xugc5v.fsf@gnu.org> <83r0w6uaad.fsf@gnu.org> <87fscmemeo.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83358mu1tv.fsf@gnu.org> <87bknaek9z.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83v8lisjlx.fsf@gnu.org> <87lemeh4wz.fsf@igel.home> <83h6x2sb5x.fsf@gnu.org> <87cz7qh2db.fsf@igel.home> <83a62usabj.fsf@gnu.org> <878rieh194.fsf@igel.home> <838ries9je.fsf@gnu.org> <874jt2h0hq.fsf@igel.home> <835ydis7qt.fsf@gnu.org> <87zgaufj4w.fsf@igel.home> X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2023 16:40:15 +0100 > > On Jan 07 2023, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > >> From: Andreas Schwab > >> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > >> Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2023 15:40:01 +0100 > >> > >> On Jan 07 2023, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> > >> > So the problem is that we are now using libtool, and that causes the > >> > GDB executable to be in a directory different from where gdb-gdb.gdb > >> > is kept. > >> > >> That does not happen for me. Did you configure with --enable-shared? > > > > No. Why would I need to? > > Without it, libtool should have no reason to put gdb in .libs. I see. Well, here it is. > > GDB is not a library, and doesn't build libraries that need to be > > installed, AFAIK. > > So why does it create the gdb binary in .libs? It is empty for me. I don't know. Any libtool experts around here?