From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <eliz@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E4CB395B457
 for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Wed,  9 Jun 2021 13:05:35 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 0E4CB395B457
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:42344)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1lqxtm-0006Ws-L8; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 09:05:34 -0400
Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:2083
 helo=home-c4e4a596f7)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <eliz@gnu.org>)
 id 1lqxtm-0006Yz-97; Wed, 09 Jun 2021 09:05:34 -0400
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 16:05:18 +0300
Message-Id: <83zgvzcho1.fsf@gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Vasili Burdo <vasili.burdo@gmail.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
In-Reply-To: <CANacp63dU8qx-bO1HHe2-kXrXfNsHc0DS2sA0cRxt9Yukvi9vg@mail.gmail.com>
 (message from Vasili Burdo on Wed, 9 Jun 2021 15:56:38 +0300)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TUI disassembly window improvemenmt
References: <CANacp63m7cPtnWOgRduPgk0U4Wj3UnvpXR1H+x=pThh19V4iGw@mail.gmail.com>
 <831r9bdxpj.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CANacp63dU8qx-bO1HHe2-kXrXfNsHc0DS2sA0cRxt9Yukvi9vg@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
 RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS,
 TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/gdb-patches>,
 <mailto:gdb-patches-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/gdb-patches>,
 <mailto:gdb-patches-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2021 13:05:38 -0000

> From: Vasili Burdo <vasili.burdo@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 15:56:38 +0300
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> 
> > Shouldn't this be optional behavior?  Not everyone disassembles only
> > C++ code.
> This patch does not limit disassembly view in any way.
> - The current  function name moved from disassembly line to window header
> - Offset from function start still present in disassembly line
> - Function start is marked by function name label.

But AFAIU only the current function's name is visible; if some other
function is referenced in the disassembly, it will now be invisible,
right?

IOW, you seem to assume that any function names mentioned in the
disassembly are always the name of the current function, but is that
an assumption that is always correct?