From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 124293 invoked by alias); 27 Dec 2019 07:49:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 124281 invoked by uid 89); 27 Dec 2019 07:49:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=Pedro, pedro, H*MI:sk:831rstw X-HELO: eggs.gnu.org Received: from eggs.gnu.org (HELO eggs.gnu.org) (209.51.188.92) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 07:49:52 +0000 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56882) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ikkNZ-00070B-OB; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 02:49:49 -0500 Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3159 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ikkNZ-0002ot-70; Fri, 27 Dec 2019 02:49:49 -0500 Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 07:49:00 -0000 Message-Id: <83zhfep5r8.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Christian Biesinger CC: brobecker@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-reply-to: (message from Christian Biesinger on Thu, 26 Dec 2019 23:39:36 +0100) Subject: Re: GDB 9.1 release 2019-12-23 update References: <20191223093031.GE11677@adacore.com> <835zi7xh7o.fsf@gnu.org> <20191224034652.GA25918@adacore.com> <831rstwv8g.fsf@gnu.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2019-12/txt/msg01033.txt.bz2 > From: Christian Biesinger > Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2019 23:39:36 +0100 > Cc: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches > > > I added an attachment with the patch to the Bugzilla report, it should > > appear shortly on the bug-binutils mailing list. Let's see what > > happens next. > > I don't know how binutils works, but if they work like gdb, it may be > worth sending the patch to the binutils mailing list directly instead > of relying on people to read bug-binutils? I'm fine with that, but if they don't read bug-binutils, then why does that list even exist? I actually suggest that Joel or Pedro post to the binutils mailing list quoting the Bugzilla report and/or the bug-binutils messages https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2019-11/msg00006.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/2019-12/msg00162.html and telling the Binutils folks that this currently blocks a GDB release. I think this would have a much more profound effect than me doing the same. Or we could make the release regardless of the libctf issues with MinGW.