From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFB403858D34 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 07:01:19 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org AFB403858D34 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org AFB403858D34 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2001:470:142:3::10 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1712214081; cv=none; b=CbO3WCHaTfsE2rbsrSN7Mzi4Z5uwdc7+cPyAyjD2tP0h41pFl6PHeLlqoEJHsDpIEIfZKrgwuDbPAczdncXylNIz+3FLxfMEdIL7185w4y3jzehOmJ8Lb34xyW4UYij2ou9HGMjsEDR3NYzuWM1CSdeNVa+2ebz9T9c9Vj5ewmk= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1712214081; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wu7sKvwN8Utv/Ecm9Ffut8O5rYnIkm+VbrmFV0Km15Q=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:Message-Id:From:To:Subject; b=BnTcNP+V/DdOElMTYNblSTuc3/SmrUE56OEWopuo3HQ1iPJPowLMevVtAKvAg/5/OP8KwzNXvB8deBNMYtyiGtLHNNh8GQOvrdHWuUfNIkU+TPqVsPaDImVD1aJ3P0I4PrEsmCVF9mqk2seI9PNAvABx6DhUj9Rgf5UWnBR5kKY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rsH65-0007k7-TW; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 03:01:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=QwdI/TW6vMR9ZbemCiTXWUqioeDIGnMhkqtU/Jvbsf8=; b=QMrQjDZdLa3g 6opRJvxR676urZmTxlrY7uxIrfo6vX7mjBFoWKVEI3OLeMbWWJQUJpaB2hcJutgf2K0txIvKO37Dl IDJBpY3ueO1JgHs2EEm8NQJncVWiHyEKjMiw6Oxs0EQCpb9PWaebh+fus6Z8Vy0M4tNEKbNbng/Ds /nyoJc+/SuFTuTw2iDLIMQo0gW1MGpwI24Uxxu7KIMjdho8AN4vX9yRHaFwZp/S9b8UQr3ghsH67w MPidvzZzCZ8cAzRy/Gb1Bbhv/S8hlIMxcznGZO4EwHesot1U1ChobLI9kQ+NwV0qqkVz4nxxwKnNu VTWgLygmEr4rNwbz6qGXqw==; Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 10:00:58 +0300 Message-Id: <8634s18vdh.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: "Metzger, Markus T" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, achronop@gmail.com, blarsen@redhat.com In-Reply-To: (markus.t.metzger@intel.com) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change message when reaching end of reverse history. References: <20240313204830.2521708-1-achronop@gmail.com> <50e7e7f5-024b-4ac8-be5c-948ad2f41e73@redhat.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > From: "Metzger, Markus T" > CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , "Alex > Chronopoulos" , Guinevere Larsen > Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 06:22:14 +0000 > > I see no reason for changing the existing portion. The message is short enough: > > No more reverse-execution history. Recording will continue. > > Eli, are you OK with that change? I don't think I ever chimed into this discussion, and I'm not sure I even understand the issue well enough. But just on the face of it: doesn't a bare "Recording will continue" fail to say anything about the execution, which AFAIU also switches to some other mode in this case? If the above makes no sense, would someone please explain in more detail what was the original issue, and I will try to come up with a better suggestion.