From: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
To: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Cc: Tom de Vries <tdevries@suse.de>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [pushed] Support -prompt and -lbl in gdb_test (Re: [PATCH 5/5] Make gdb_test's question non-optional if specified)
Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 13:42:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <865d12b0-0e9d-20b6-c161-d70645ce2f48@palves.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ee0qinpy.fsf@tromey.com>
On 2022-05-18 21:34, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net> writes:
>
> Pedro> Instead of going back to how it used to be, I'm thinking of adding a new
> Pedro> option to gdb_test, "gdb_test -nopass". The advantage of this approach is
> Pedro> that we always have a message for the FAIL case this way, and, it's more
> Pedro> explicit.
>
> I like this a lot more than the current approach.
Alright, see here:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-May/189231.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-19 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-30 19:29 [PATCH 0/5] Make gdb_test's question non-optional if specified Pedro Alves
2022-03-30 19:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] Remove gdb_test questions that GDB doesn't ask Pedro Alves
2022-03-30 19:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] gdb.base/scope.exp: Remove bogus gdb_test questions Pedro Alves
2022-03-30 19:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] Fix bogus gdb_test invocations Pedro Alves
2022-03-30 19:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] Avoid having to unload file in gdb.server/connect-with-no-symbol-file.exp Pedro Alves
2022-03-30 19:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] Make gdb_test's question non-optional if specified Pedro Alves
2022-04-07 20:31 ` Bruno Larsen
2022-04-08 12:18 ` Pedro Alves
2022-05-17 10:13 ` [PATCH 5/6] gdb.base/skip.exp: Don't abuse gdb_test's question support (Re: [PATCH 5/5] Make gdb_test's question non-optional if specified) Pedro Alves
2022-05-16 16:01 ` [PATCH 5/5] Make gdb_test's question non-optional if specified Tom Tromey
2022-05-17 11:25 ` Pedro Alves
2022-05-17 22:48 ` Tom Tromey
2022-05-18 11:01 ` [pushed] Support -prompt and -lbl in gdb_test (Re: [PATCH 5/5] Make gdb_test's question non-optional if specified) Pedro Alves
2022-05-18 12:15 ` Tom de Vries
2022-05-18 12:36 ` Pedro Alves
2022-05-18 14:13 ` Pedro Alves
2022-05-18 14:49 ` Tom de Vries
2022-05-18 20:34 ` Tom Tromey
2022-05-19 12:42 ` Pedro Alves [this message]
2022-05-23 10:48 ` Tom de Vries
2022-05-23 12:01 ` Tom de Vries
2022-05-23 12:50 ` [committed][gdb/testsuite] Fix -prompt handling in gdb_test Tom de Vries
2022-05-23 12:53 ` [pushed] Support -prompt and -lbl in gdb_test (Re: [PATCH 5/5] Make gdb_test's question non-optional if specified) Pedro Alves
2022-05-17 11:41 ` [PATCH 5/5] Make gdb_test's question non-optional if specified Simon Marchi
2022-05-17 12:04 ` Pedro Alves
2022-05-16 16:02 ` [PATCH 0/5] " Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=865d12b0-0e9d-20b6-c161-d70645ce2f48@palves.net \
--to=pedro@palves.net \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=tdevries@suse.de \
--cc=tom@tromey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).