[PATCH 1/2] Add rdrand/rdseed record/replay tests

[PATCH 1/2] Add rdrand/rdseed record/replay tests

[Luis Machado]

This patch adds rdrand/rdseed record/replay tests.

With an unsupported architecture, this should yield the following testsuite
results:

    === gdb Summary ===

# of expected passes	1
# of untested testcases	  1

gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog:

2017-01-26  Luis Machado  <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>

	* gdb.reverse/insn-reverse.c: Include insn-reverse-x86.c.
	* gdb.reverse/insn-reverse-x86.c: New file.
---
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/insn-reverse-x86.c | 261 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/insn-reverse.c     |   2 +
 2 files changed, 263 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/insn-reverse-x86.c

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/insn-reverse-x86.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/insn-reverse-x86.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8d1fbbf
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/insn-reverse-x86.c
@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
+/* This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
+
+   Copyright 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+   This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+   it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+   the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+   (at your option) any later version.
+
+   This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+   GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+   You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+   along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.  */
+
+#include <cpuid.h>
+#include <stdint.h>
+
+/* 0 if the CPU supports rdrand/rdseed and non-zero otherwise.  */
+static unsigned int supports_rdrand;
+
+/* Fetches information from cpuid and sets flags indicating supported
+   features.  */
+
+static unsigned int
+check_cpu_support (void)
+{
+  unsigned int rdrand_mask = (1 << 30);
+  unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
+
+  __get_cpuid(1, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
+  return ((ecx & rdrand_mask) == rdrand_mask);
+}
+
+/* Test rdrand support for various output registers.  */
+
+void
+rdrand (void)
+{
+  /* Get a random number from the rdrand assembly instruction.  */
+  register uint64_t number;
+
+  if (!supports_rdrand)
+    return;
+
+  /* 16-bit random numbers.  */
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%ax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%bx;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%cx;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%dx;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%di, %%ax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%di;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%ax, %%di;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%si, %%ax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%si;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%ax, %%si;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%bp, %%ax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%bp;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%ax, %%bp;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%sp, %%ax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%sp;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%ax, %%sp;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r8w;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r9w;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r10w;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r11w;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r12w;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r13w;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r14w;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r15w;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  /* 32-bit random numbers.  */
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%eax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%ebx;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%ecx;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%edx;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rdi, %%rax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%edi;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rdi;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rsi, %%rax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%esi;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rsi;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rbp, %%rax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%ebp;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rbp;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rsp, %%rax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%esp;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rsp;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r8d;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r9d;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r10d;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r11d;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r12d;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r13d;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r14d;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r15d;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  /* 64-bit random numbers.  */
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%rax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%rbx;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%rcx;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%rdx;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rdi, %%rax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%rdi;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rdi;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rsi, %%rax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%rsi;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rsi;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rbp, %%rax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%rbp;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rbp;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rsp, %%rax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%rsp;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rsp;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r8;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r9;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r10;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r11;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r12;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r13;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r14;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r15;" : "=r" (number));
+}
+
+/* Test rdseed support for various output registers.  */
+
+void
+rdseed (void)
+{
+  /* Get a random seed from the rdseed assembly instruction.  */
+  register long seed;
+
+  if (!supports_rdrand)
+    return;
+
+  /* 16-bit random seeds.  */
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%ax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%bx;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%cx;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%dx;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%di, %%ax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%di;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%ax, %%di;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%si, %%ax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%si;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%ax, %%si;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%bp, %%ax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%bp;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%ax, %%bp;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%sp, %%ax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%sp;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%ax, %%sp;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r8w;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r9w;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r10w;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r11w;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r12w;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r13w;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r14w;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r15w;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  /* 32-bit random seeds.  */
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%eax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%ebx;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%ecx;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%edx;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rdi, %%rax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%edi;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rdi;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rsi, %%rax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%esi;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rsi;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rbp, %%rax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%ebp;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rbp;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rsp, %%rax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%esp;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rsp;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r8d;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r9d;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r10d;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r11d;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r12d;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r13d;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r14d;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r15d;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  /* 64-bit random seeds.  */
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%rax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%rbx;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%rcx;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%rdx;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rdi, %%rax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%rdi;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rdi;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rsi, %%rax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%rsi;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rsi;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rbp, %%rax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%rbp;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rbp;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rsp, %%rax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%rsp;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rsp;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r8;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r9;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r10;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r11;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r12;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r13;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r14;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r15;" : "=r" (seed));
+}
+
+/* Initialize arch-specific bits.  */
+
+static void
+initialize (void)
+{
+  /* Check for rdseed/rdseed support.  */
+  supports_rdrand = check_cpu_support ();
+}
+
+/* Functions testing instruction decodings.  GDB will test all of these.  */
+static testcase_ftype testcases[] =
+{
+  rdrand,
+  rdseed
+};
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/insn-reverse.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/insn-reverse.c
index 662a02b..26a22a9 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/insn-reverse.c
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/insn-reverse.c
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ typedef void (*testcase_ftype) (void);
 #include "insn-reverse-aarch64.c"
 #elif (defined __arm__)
 #include "insn-reverse-arm.c"
+#elif (defined __x86_64__) || (defined __i386__)
+#include "insn-reverse-x86.c"
 #else
 /* We get here if the current architecture being tested doesn't have any
    record/replay instruction decoding tests implemented.  */
-- 
2.7.4

[PATCH 2/2] [BZ 21005] Add support for Intel 64 rdrand and rdseed record/replay

[Luis Machado]

The following patch addresses BZ 21005, which is gdb failing to
recognize an rdrand instruction.

It enables support for both rdrand and rdseed and handles extended register
addressing (R8~R15) for 16-bit, 32-bit and 64-bit.

I tested this by hand with quite a few lines of inline asm.  I thought we
had arch-specific tests in testsuite/, but it looks like we don't exercise
every little instruction with record/replay, so no testcase.  Let me know
if one is required.

Regression-tested on Ubuntu 16.04 x86-64.

Testsuite results are as follows:

    === gdb Summary ===

# of expected passes	159

OK?

gdb/ChangeLog

2017-01-26  Luis Machado  <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>

	* NEWS: Mention support for record/replay of Intel 64 rdrand and
	rdseed instructions.
	i386-tdep.c (i386_process_record): Handle Intel 64 rdrand and rseed.
---
 gdb/NEWS        |  3 +++
 gdb/i386-tdep.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/NEWS b/gdb/NEWS
index 21e8cd3..0f63d9f 100644
--- a/gdb/NEWS
+++ b/gdb/NEWS
@@ -3,6 +3,9 @@
 
 *** Changes since GDB 7.12
 
+* GDB now supports recording and replaying rdrand and rdseed Intel 64
+  instructions.
+
 * Building GDB and GDBserver now requires a C++11 compiler.
 
   For example, GCC 4.8 or later.
diff --git a/gdb/i386-tdep.c b/gdb/i386-tdep.c
index 8a4d59f..50327bb 100644
--- a/gdb/i386-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/i386-tdep.c
@@ -5501,14 +5501,36 @@ i386_process_record (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, struct regcache *regcache,
       I386_RECORD_FULL_ARCH_LIST_ADD_REG (X86_RECORD_EFLAGS_REGNUM);
       break;
 
-    case 0x0fc7:    /* cmpxchg8b */
+    case 0x0fc7:    /* cmpxchg8b / rdrand / rdseed */
       if (i386_record_modrm (&ir))
 	return -1;
       if (ir.mod == 3)
 	{
-	  ir.addr -= 2;
-	  opcode = opcode << 8 | ir.modrm;
-	  goto no_support;
+	  /* rdrand and rdseed use the 3 bits of the REG field of ModR/M as
+	     an extended opcode.  rdrand has bits 110 (/6) and rdseed
+	     has bits 111 (/7).  */
+	  if (ir.reg == 6 || ir.reg == 7)
+	    {
+	      /* The storage register is described by the 3 R/M bits, but the
+		 REX.B prefix may be used to give access to registers
+		 R8~R15.  In this case ir.rex_b + R/M will give us the register
+		 in the range R8~R15.
+
+		 REX.W may also be used to access 64-bit registers, but we
+		 already record entire registers and not just partial bits
+		 of them.  */
+	      I386_RECORD_FULL_ARCH_LIST_ADD_REG (ir.rex_b + ir.rm);
+	      /* These instructions also set conditional bits.  */
+	      I386_RECORD_FULL_ARCH_LIST_ADD_REG (X86_RECORD_EFLAGS_REGNUM);
+	      break;
+	    }
+	  else
+	    {
+	      /* We don't handle this particular instruction yet.  */
+	      ir.addr -= 2;
+	      opcode = opcode << 8 | ir.modrm;
+	      goto no_support;
+	    }
 	}
       I386_RECORD_FULL_ARCH_LIST_ADD_REG (X86_RECORD_REAX_REGNUM);
       I386_RECORD_FULL_ARCH_LIST_ADD_REG (X86_RECORD_REDX_REGNUM);
-- 
2.7.4

Re: [PATCH 2/2] [BZ 21005] Add support for Intel 64 rdrand and rdseed record/replay

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2017 11:18:49 -0600
> 
> The following patch addresses BZ 21005, which is gdb failing to
> recognize an rdrand instruction.
> 
> It enables support for both rdrand and rdseed and handles extended register
> addressing (R8~R15) for 16-bit, 32-bit and 64-bit.
> 
> I tested this by hand with quite a few lines of inline asm.  I thought we
> had arch-specific tests in testsuite/, but it looks like we don't exercise
> every little instruction with record/replay, so no testcase.  Let me know
> if one is required.
> 
> Regression-tested on Ubuntu 16.04 x86-64.
> 
> Testsuite results are as follows:
> 
>     === gdb Summary ===
> 
> # of expected passes	159
> 
> OK?
> 
> gdb/ChangeLog
> 
> 2017-01-26  Luis Machado  <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
> 
> 	* NEWS: Mention support for record/replay of Intel 64 rdrand and
> 	rdseed instructions.
> 	i386-tdep.c (i386_process_record): Handle Intel 64 rdrand and rseed.

OK for the NEWS part.

Re: [PATCH 2/2] [BZ 21005] Add support for Intel 64 rdrand and rdseed record/replay

[Pedro Alves]

On 01/26/2017 05:18 PM, Luis Machado wrote:
> The following patch addresses BZ 21005, which is gdb failing to
> recognize an rdrand instruction.

Suggest saying "this patch".  "following" won't make sense
when this sentence is part of the git log history.

> [....] I thought we
> had arch-specific tests in testsuite/, but it looks like we don't exercise
> every little instruction with record/replay, so no testcase.  Let me know
> if one is required.

This remark looks out of date?

> 
> OK?

Please remember to remove this, as it doesn't make sense to have
it in a commit log.

> 
> gdb/ChangeLog
> 
> 2017-01-26  Luis Machado  <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
> 
> 	* NEWS: Mention support for record/replay of Intel 64 rdrand and
> 	rdseed instructions.
> 	i386-tdep.c (i386_process_record): Handle Intel 64 rdrand and rseed.

OK.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add rdrand/rdseed record/replay tests

[Luis Machado]

On 01/26/2017 11:18 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
> This patch adds rdrand/rdseed record/replay tests.
>
> With an unsupported architecture, this should yield the following testsuite
> results:
>
>     === gdb Summary ===
>
> # of expected passes	1
> # of untested testcases	  1
>

To clarify, "unsupported" as in "there are no insn-reverse.exp" tests 
for this architecture.

If gdb doesn't know how to reverse step/continue over rdrand/rdseed, we 
will get these:

		=== gdb Summary ===

# of expected passes		9
# of unexpected failures	996

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add rdrand/rdseed record/replay tests

[Pedro Alves]

On 01/26/2017 05:23 PM, Luis Machado wrote:
> On 01/26/2017 11:18 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
>> This patch adds rdrand/rdseed record/replay tests.
>>
>> With an unsupported architecture, this should yield the following
>> testsuite
>> results:
>>
>>     === gdb Summary ===
>>
>> # of expected passes    1
>> # of untested testcases      1
>>
> 
> To clarify, "unsupported" as in "there are no insn-reverse.exp" tests
> for this architecture.
> 
> If gdb doesn't know how to reverse step/continue over rdrand/rdseed, we
> will get these:
> 
>         === gdb Summary ===
> 
> # of expected passes        9
> # of unexpected failures    996

Please remember to push the GDB fix before the test, or squash them,
in order to avoid introducing known-failures, to help with bisects,
and the buildbots.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add rdrand/rdseed record/replay tests

[Pedro Alves]

On 01/26/2017 05:18 PM, Luis Machado wrote:

> +/* Fetches information from cpuid and sets flags indicating supported
> +   features.  */

What flags?

> +
> +static unsigned int
> +check_cpu_support (void)
> +{
> +  unsigned int rdrand_mask = (1 << 30);
> +  unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
> +
> +  __get_cpuid(1, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);

Space before parens.

> +  return ((ecx & rdrand_mask) == rdrand_mask);
> +}
> +

Thanks,
Pedro Alves

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add rdrand/rdseed record/replay tests

[Luis Machado]

On 02/01/2017 05:09 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 01/26/2017 05:18 PM, Luis Machado wrote:
>
>> +/* Fetches information from cpuid and sets flags indicating supported
>> +   features.  */
>
> What flags?
>

This is stale. The function should actually be called 
check_rdrand_support, so that's what it does. In my previous design it 
checked for a number of features, but i've trimmed it down.

>> +
>> +static unsigned int
>> +check_cpu_support (void)
>> +{
>> +  unsigned int rdrand_mask = (1 << 30);
>> +  unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
>> +
>> +  __get_cpuid(1, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
>

Fixed locally.

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add rdrand/rdseed record/replay tests

[Luis Machado]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 734 bytes --]

On 02/01/2017 06:42 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
> On 02/01/2017 05:09 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>> On 01/26/2017 05:18 PM, Luis Machado wrote:
>>
>>> +/* Fetches information from cpuid and sets flags indicating supported
>>> +   features.  */
>>
>> What flags?
>>
>
> This is stale. The function should actually be called
> check_rdrand_support, so that's what it does. In my previous design it
> checked for a number of features, but i've trimmed it down.
>
>>> +
>>> +static unsigned int
>>> +check_cpu_support (void)
>>> +{
>>> +  unsigned int rdrand_mask = (1 << 30);
>>> +  unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
>>> +
>>> +  __get_cpuid(1, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
>>
>
> Fixed locally.
>

Here's the updated version of the tests patch.





[-- Attachment #2: 0002-Add-rdrand-rdseed-record-replay-tests.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 11435 bytes --]

2017-02-01  Luis Machado  <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>

	* gdb.reverse/insn-reverse.c: Include insn-reverse-x86.c.
	* gdb.reverse/insn-reverse-x86.c: New file.
---
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/insn-reverse-x86.c | 261 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/insn-reverse.c     |   2 +
 2 files changed, 263 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/insn-reverse-x86.c

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/insn-reverse-x86.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/insn-reverse-x86.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..7f87392
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/insn-reverse-x86.c
@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
+/* This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
+
+   Copyright 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+   This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+   it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+   the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+   (at your option) any later version.
+
+   This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+   GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+   You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+   along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.  */
+
+#include <cpuid.h>
+#include <stdint.h>
+
+/* 0 if the CPU supports rdrand/rdseed and non-zero otherwise.  */
+static unsigned int supports_rdrand;
+
+/* Returns non-zero if rdrand/rdseed instructions are supported and
+   zero otherwise.  */
+
+static unsigned int
+check_rdrand_support (void)
+{
+  unsigned int rdrand_mask = (1 << 30);
+  unsigned int eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
+
+  __get_cpuid (1, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
+  return ((ecx & rdrand_mask) == rdrand_mask);
+}
+
+/* Test rdrand support for various output registers.  */
+
+void
+rdrand (void)
+{
+  /* Get a random number from the rdrand assembly instruction.  */
+  register uint64_t number;
+
+  if (!supports_rdrand)
+    return;
+
+  /* 16-bit random numbers.  */
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%ax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%bx;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%cx;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%dx;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%di, %%ax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%di;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%ax, %%di;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%si, %%ax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%si;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%ax, %%si;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%bp, %%ax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%bp;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%ax, %%bp;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%sp, %%ax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%sp;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%ax, %%sp;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r8w;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r9w;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r10w;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r11w;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r12w;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r13w;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r14w;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r15w;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  /* 32-bit random numbers.  */
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%eax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%ebx;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%ecx;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%edx;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rdi, %%rax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%edi;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rdi;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rsi, %%rax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%esi;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rsi;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rbp, %%rax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%ebp;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rbp;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rsp, %%rax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%esp;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rsp;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r8d;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r9d;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r10d;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r11d;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r12d;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r13d;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r14d;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r15d;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  /* 64-bit random numbers.  */
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%rax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%rbx;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%rcx;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%rdx;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rdi, %%rax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%rdi;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rdi;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rsi, %%rax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%rsi;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rsi;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rbp, %%rax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%rbp;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rbp;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rsp, %%rax;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%rsp;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rsp;" : "=r" (number));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r8;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r9;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r10;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r11;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r12;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r13;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r14;" : "=r" (number));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdrand %%r15;" : "=r" (number));
+}
+
+/* Test rdseed support for various output registers.  */
+
+void
+rdseed (void)
+{
+  /* Get a random seed from the rdseed assembly instruction.  */
+  register long seed;
+
+  if (!supports_rdrand)
+    return;
+
+  /* 16-bit random seeds.  */
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%ax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%bx;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%cx;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%dx;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%di, %%ax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%di;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%ax, %%di;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%si, %%ax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%si;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%ax, %%si;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%bp, %%ax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%bp;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%ax, %%bp;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%sp, %%ax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%sp;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%ax, %%sp;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r8w;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r9w;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r10w;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r11w;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r12w;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r13w;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r14w;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r15w;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  /* 32-bit random seeds.  */
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%eax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%ebx;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%ecx;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%edx;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rdi, %%rax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%edi;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rdi;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rsi, %%rax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%esi;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rsi;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rbp, %%rax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%ebp;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rbp;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rsp, %%rax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%esp;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rsp;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r8d;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r9d;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r10d;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r11d;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r12d;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r13d;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r14d;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r15d;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  /* 64-bit random seeds.  */
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%rax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%rbx;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%rcx;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%rdx;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rdi, %%rax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%rdi;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rdi;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rsi, %%rax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%rsi;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rsi;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rbp, %%rax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%rbp;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rbp;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rsp, %%rax;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%rsp;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("mov %%rax, %%rsp;" : "=r" (seed));
+
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r8;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r9;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r10;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r11;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r12;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r13;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r14;" : "=r" (seed));
+  __asm__ volatile ("rdseed %%r15;" : "=r" (seed));
+}
+
+/* Initialize arch-specific bits.  */
+
+static void
+initialize (void)
+{
+  /* Initialize supported features.  */
+  supports_rdrand = check_rdrand_support ();
+}
+
+/* Functions testing instruction decodings.  GDB will test all of these.  */
+static testcase_ftype testcases[] =
+{
+  rdrand,
+  rdseed
+};
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/insn-reverse.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/insn-reverse.c
index 662a02b..26a22a9 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/insn-reverse.c
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/insn-reverse.c
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ typedef void (*testcase_ftype) (void);
 #include "insn-reverse-aarch64.c"
 #elif (defined __arm__)
 #include "insn-reverse-arm.c"
+#elif (defined __x86_64__) || (defined __i386__)
+#include "insn-reverse-x86.c"
 #else
 /* We get here if the current architecture being tested doesn't have any
    record/replay instruction decoding tests implemented.  */
-- 
2.7.4

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add rdrand/rdseed record/replay tests

[Pedro Alves]

On 02/01/2017 12:55 PM, Luis Machado wrote:

> Here's the updated version of the tests patch.

OK.

Thanks,
Pedro Alves

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add rdrand/rdseed record/replay tests

[Luis Machado]

On 02/01/2017 09:37 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 02/01/2017 12:55 PM, Luis Machado wrote:
>
>> Here's the updated version of the tests patch.
>
> OK.
>
> Thanks,
> Pedro Alves
>
>

Thanks, pushed as 20b477a75c00de06a92b9577fd74416699d2c37f.

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add rdrand/rdseed record/replay tests

[Yao Qi]

Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com> writes:

> Here's the updated version of the tests patch.

Hi Luis,
This test fails on x86_64-linux, reported in PR 21166.  Could you take
a look?  This test contributes to 500 fails in gdb.sum.

-- 
Yao (齐尧)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add rdrand/rdseed record/replay tests

[Luis Machado]

On 02/23/2017 10:23 AM, Yao Qi wrote:
> Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com> writes:
>
>> Here's the updated version of the tests patch.
>
> Hi Luis,
> This test fails on x86_64-linux, reported in PR 21166.  Could you take
> a look?  This test contributes to 500 fails in gdb.sum.
>

Sure. That flew under my radar.

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add rdrand/rdseed record/replay tests

[Luis Machado]

On 02/23/2017 11:20 AM, Luis Machado wrote:
> On 02/23/2017 10:23 AM, Yao Qi wrote:
>> Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com> writes:
>>
>>> Here's the updated version of the tests patch.
>>
>> Hi Luis,
>> This test fails on x86_64-linux, reported in PR 21166.  Could you take
>> a look?  This test contributes to 500 fails in gdb.sum.
>>
>
> Sure. That flew under my radar.
>

Is this blocking a release, just so i can get a sense of deadline.

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Add rdrand/rdseed record/replay tests

[Yao Qi]

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Luis Machado <lgustavo@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Is this blocking a release, just so i can get a sense of deadline.

My understanding is that it doesn't block a release.

-- 
Yao (齐尧)