From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [209.51.188.92]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AAFC3858D35 for ; Tue, 14 May 2024 17:08:52 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 8AAFC3858D35 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 8AAFC3858D35 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=209.51.188.92 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1715706534; cv=none; b=tkG2/jqpFXzsHMssL/cenIk1hVaIl+bxrkT0NYU9nlEO1B0DDxgRYo8ARvsiDwUixOcAOT67GjO0yZOW9NySKfDZlGXn6eYc3zyp+CHCAoZPnRniFOzVNbx+2B4zkXqEHK/RaR9R+KZHkP2vI5Pfn6TyGycuZFv3kGeUORoPvaI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1715706534; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BJ9U8VbdGC/yYkExtsKcb3IKclaqLGFjhBcOjRj3+PY=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:Message-Id:From:To:Subject; b=yD2evKi9f30tKINvI8fCX+/eSpK2dK5yyuoU70ZOxdXMMFWVa9TguHdd9xTbYCOxH5EyJReSkudUOcdMOohmnYwl746d5hP1eb4lV/OP7sk3aNakkZFtsXOMhw4she7WVx6ZdfHXW8YsnQ9cojJ+VrCqjMD1UlPLpU4oQIo6Tzw= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s6ZYh-0006RG-V4; Mon, 13 May 2024 13:33:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=Kv7Va2kjRGk11gbE9PhZy/oUrKXDP120njRE77/IqCs=; b=r+cWlGZXvmzk AktZj9YfvgjSz/1Cr5zaD4U70wYA98O0soZ9I2esWJkIvT8bMJn5fgOcTDFlpuWBhGqy93QROVzao rUsijLOc9pPD5/2645Iy4zsxn1hePtTazNqk++UOmogKV9+/AX5ih57/Hqu/MQTK6/o8LZdso+VaO NHC9V9BCWVmks38IBT4X+oBQ7KDGNRukU8HsmMGpNz+w50LhuzzcVTkFeUgU9gMmVv54+H7bZqtCS JL0L3wD/PS/SAwYyTmIYk7mFxf5RaJ2OoMwdGVo+fXbXp++kfwwDm+ulfejIIo9oIhqT+wSvFQIwx c39fQEPg6ejQV3c3EoO5zg==; Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 20:33:51 +0300 Message-Id: <867cfxy5ts.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Tom Tromey Cc: aburgess@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <87v83hzo5o.fsf@tromey.com> (message from Tom Tromey on Mon, 13 May 2024 10:12:35 -0600) Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] gdb/doc: don't try to copy GDBvn.texi from the source tree References: <2575da42cc2fe75091abb9e34cebe0fbc4e31523.1715420013.git.aburgess@redhat.com> <87v83hzo5o.fsf@tromey.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > From: Tom Tromey > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > Date: Mon, 13 May 2024 10:12:35 -0600 > > >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Burgess writes: > > Andrew> That's right, we also have a rule that builds GDBvn.texi, and > Andrew> GDBvn.texi is in the dependency list for both gdb.dvi and gdb.pdf. > > Andrew> On top of this, GDBvn.texi was removed from the source tree in 2000, > Andrew> in this commit: > > Andrew> commit 1171f8d754f71e35fd2f6c4e82b00f3c685e515f > Andrew> Date: Tue Feb 8 03:37:34 2000 +0000 > > Andrew> 2000-02-07 Jason Molenda (jsm@bugshack.cygnus.com) > > Andrew> I think we can assume that everyone is happy generating GDBvn.texi, so > Andrew> lets remove the redundant copying code. > > I am not sure about this change. > > I downloaded gdb-14.2.tar.xz and I do see gdb/doc/GDBvn.texi in the > source tree there. I think this is done because we also ship the .info > files, so that users won't have to have makeinfo in order to build. Right. So I don't think we should remove GDBvn.texi from the tarball. > (I'm not sure how well that plan really works since there used to be > open bugs about not building when makeinfo is missing ... not sure of > the current state.) Building GDB doesn't require running makeinfo, at least it didn't in GDB 14.