From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 306F13849AEE for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:25:33 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 306F13849AEE Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 306F13849AEE Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2001:470:142:3::10 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1713540335; cv=none; b=QgpVAkHovOay7Cj3oZoZYhPX5DHoH2qqEFbWROdL4CzeN9X8qFm7gUsGWtuOdzUstxKS8GuERCTIBLHu+rV2aELMGwvOIZCr8KNY6MFQYfzkB9GLjTrga4TTUmy4GM9+azynYJg2MADbmgTF7lQTomfG9AbP2GwR4wAi8ptWXKQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1713540335; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NWsHpSid9eT13cb+Hy8Eq/xx4hmU56uSwYqyL9CfIaA=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:Message-Id:From:To:Subject; b=kSH5OE63u4dDKbyq6jwWoBAYqel0Xodtmp2MkBgR6YNrdGw8vGjXUaaZWzv2rdq9FWXJN/fnFXEkmObqU17Oo5prir/1dmHi2FVaAtZN069SxCnhQkkfe1kXX0xEVfW6XY7hl28qcQY+trzKcHN8Q+Lj5p5Sd4XG137SdTyDQPs= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rxq7H-0003Ie-7C; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 11:25:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=jsfhugh4LUFdN+iMpANtjyAdrRipsZGIftGMchc03x0=; b=ldVDdR3uEdvE MCL8cr6GDLbeF7FKaLI9zcVsd5aPleDZ2+COa263xbrMO5XOur+qeQkezznnKfYcmZxSi9dWNZMiy FZmKstjiRvGaIX/rgE0u3RSxJ7GHapXGiAVeJE6r6rJ7gQx24KT62TmMvzernBMXPPqJF1T4Kq/dl TktDhClhy670fxYtLj0H9fwCbTzClWgBngKXHkvR+4Yvzsdu/fzH/ZZCDKgKNzKygZjPC3ZwP43PO oJuHVQt00kt/b/UKONisyvlmPYlgppFhqwSA91JggA2Z6dMLFEY6arYFHitWuh1Pezms08wioLs6l tjD32p586WDrOAsyggLElA==; Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 18:25:26 +0300 Message-Id: <867cgtbcih.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, jimb@codesourcery.com, mike_wrighton@mentor.com, nathan@codesourcery.com, abidh@codesourcery.com In-Reply-To: <20240419151342.1592474-2-pedro@palves.net> (message from Pedro Alves on Fri, 19 Apr 2024 16:13:31 +0100) Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/12] Document conventions for describing packet syntax References: <20240419151342.1592474-1-pedro@palves.net> <20240419151342.1592474-2-pedro@palves.net> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > From: Pedro Alves > Cc: Jim Blandy , > Mike Wrighton , > Nathan Sidwell , > Hafiz Abid Qadeer > Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 16:13:31 +0100 > > This comment documents conventions for describing packet syntax in the > Overview section. Thanks. > +We place optional portions of a packet in @r{[}square brackets@r{]}; This should be in @samp, otherwise the @r parts are redundant and won't have any effect. > +for example, a template like @samp{c @r{[}@var{addr}@r{]}} describes a > +packet beginning with the single ASCII character @samp{c}, possibly > +followed by an @var{addr}. OK with this nit fixed. Approved-By: Eli Zaretskii