From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B5F23858CDB for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 18:31:09 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 7B5F23858CDB Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 7B5F23858CDB Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2001:470:142:3::10 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1712946671; cv=none; b=JocyAOpdxIRmzns85dO/09MVeqAQT+1JlpcN2mhRmzWdEPaXCP+5/h1LoW7sr2/qH2+Ghxq6ZQtI4eGx/Qsoz4igfs2BmSvzXwYKpjdBTaxNqCfztWw9+qg4dS4AteusXtLEO9F0eXQKj02sDCuaVczv6x2dLMBKAY7qRFk7dmU= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1712946671; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OwMpurwure9++r6aP2j2nq4M6dS0SfDu5HhI2VpXFC4=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:Message-Id:From:To:Subject; b=v9hVcnauZstEu3/8UHOEC18/Wu3Lu1pOgYWGhZk4QhFBLMbnyMyOIuD98EodjBLOHWNgwJFMTOC/tWCa4VvGuHyl5QHwU40bYf+IYI0BeX+YOGn5WYpQhtmcQXSwg21uFMvHIY+Fd3oO7VKxcbfISbT6bf1P0VKLZxXRLZHchLI= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rvLg4-0006gW-Uy; Fri, 12 Apr 2024 14:31:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=BxA0dAy8dFdFlOuw/Ln+3TmVOo2zw1anDhxC9Hc4iG8=; b=BdMTRgflmXK9 jZ7WPiysPg2xqusv6cDUClBVcCN9/vw88ebMlqJ8GwpgQe3LTJgXXewor7egNzcnVo33Mu7KFoI0H f/Yyg1KtNH1kDrIgH+768o4d0PcIUN9ewXMUyUUui2PWGhSOcKAuQeeeFGBPYCe/TU4IiHaFlhyWT IcJKSh5hYgCfUFNHCH1nDqNNSlhm8ttSnr4naR/vpps+/yApntS56X5rrwaM12zoDNlkLVOqEzpeZ R4arQrBufXoK5YixnpIcYwZ8VFpcTWs39iJH25SvK1O5AxyjNsz3JGhM1qw3Z6aTZxcHYuTLuWBuM RLquSsEvXgTN3+7KHAZ0Dw==; Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 21:31:06 +0300 Message-Id: <868r1isaad.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Andrew Burgess Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <09d4a16a33cf31f558a8982075800b113ed4a14e.1712940998.git.aburgess@redhat.com> (message from Andrew Burgess on Fri, 12 Apr 2024 18:00:23 +0100) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb/doc: use silent-rules.mk in the Makefile References: <09d4a16a33cf31f558a8982075800b113ed4a14e.1712940998.git.aburgess@redhat.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > From: Andrew Burgess > Cc: Andrew Burgess > Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2024 18:00:23 +0100 > > Make use of silent-rules.mk when building the GDB docs. > > Most of these are pretty straight forward, adding ECHO_GEN and then > lots of SILENCE prefixes. > > I added a new SILENT_QUIET_FLAG to silent-rules.mk, this is like > SILENT_FLAG, but is set to '-q' when in silent mode, this can be used > with the 'dvips' and 'texi2dvi' commands, both of which use '-q' to > mean: only report errors. > > As with the rest of the GDB makefiles, I've only converted the > "generation" rules to use silent-rules.mk, the install / uninstall > rules are left unchanged. > > There are still a few "generation" targets that produce output, there > seems to be no flag to silence the 'tex' and 'pdftex' commands which > some recipes use, I've not worried about these for now, e.g. the > refcard.dvi and refcard.pdf targets still produce some output. > > Luckily, when doing a 'make all' in the gdb/ directory, we only build > the info docs by default, and those rules are now nice and silent, so > a complete GDB build is now looking nice and quiet by default. > --- > gdb/doc/Makefile.in | 158 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------- > gdb/silent-rules.mk | 1 + > 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-) Doesn't this silence too much? Can you should the output of each rule after the changes? Thanks.