From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F286E3858C66 for ; Sun, 12 May 2024 01:41:08 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org F286E3858C66 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org F286E3858C66 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2001:470:142:3::10 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1715478078; cv=none; b=ZNp5PDLsOI45xDk/E9QqNmgGuhvssRm+54yhRrvHvL4iBU+qZmiCXTPQ5KjdfmmQ1I+TP8hV9hwIrbl+Y1gJXv+USloPGsvvR2w5wpbt9ieBjpaiNEJbBiGGnjZABg02sLvwg1q0qI94veIsq9VURBJMiA3YxKQrY1oOlmEFQ+M= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1715478078; c=relaxed/simple; bh=X0iCpS9dYEOqXrplwoHZzdWmoGHusBEXMtRMfbMIXDo=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:Message-Id:From:To:Subject; b=OYVTQ0e0MrI6wb0vfxey6RkF/evVBNczNHVk80+VTv/lWSWnLNKokGdJb/i7qg88k0WLN+TTjR0hkgl5TdTz2UnSJ0+QB6nJJXDps/L3rS8y9HRSJALUhxIlulYMDo0mSbSQt4yKBDKskUkrjCmRH3cjj17TMx2GSvCar2TfDwA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s5U6j-0005DR-9y; Fri, 10 May 2024 13:32:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=3Z8Ffcg9UK2H8ocBe/+F0lENOMC8tO+GP61MvPyBZ58=; b=astJ0iD5lv7m mBaxUrni89znFpbRpj0NN1heYRgmwCZ2gBgl3oj/jrd5LrmxinsVBciAq0LzTJzYiLIm5uLPAaC0X V/ktbmFRPp+jiseYht9FpsAyH7o/SEjVYyZJ4Fvv3oqhfCX5F879//Ck0DXjM2MXoQkAkuVyQBBMn 6H6YzuAYkMNQjGEB+M3zjUMVmJPmyHELMSThxH0HcKJXJT67D50skyefWQeCQ+yXZzE6GmCOYTKLJ a0houFte67X1+dB9vsvfH0kDPKrIM1Vs9rh+Au0iuuKujavHeQnj9IvmfysvR59xxO5c+XVkL28SH g6I3N4UHZubMKUB2VbE38A==; Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 20:32:29 +0300 Message-Id: <86bk5d4loy.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Tom Tromey Cc: ssbssa@yahoo.de, bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de, tromey@adacore.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: <87zfsx1sxp.fsf@tromey.com> (message from Tom Tromey on Fri, 10 May 2024 11:24:18 -0600) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix build issues with mingw toolchain References: <877cg7asy7.fsf@tromey.com> <87msp2ae47.fsf@tromey.com> <1129247221.406438.1715079561161@mail.yahoo.com> <87zfsx1sxp.fsf@tromey.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > From: Tom Tromey > Cc: Bernd Edlinger , Tom Tromey > , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" > > Date: Fri, 10 May 2024 11:24:18 -0600 > > >>>>> "Hannes" == Hannes Domani writes: > > Hannes> If you don't need XP support, can't you just define _WIN32_WINNT > Hannes> in CPPFLAGS? > > Yeah, it seems possible. It's possible, but it doesn't solve the problem, IME. _WIN32_WINNT is a compile-time measure, intended to make sure that if you target your program to versions of Windows >= N, running the program on older versions will likely emit an error popup, and Windows will refuse to run the program. This is not what we want here: we do want to support versions of Windows older than 10. > Maybe the problem is that unless you remember > this (it seems pretty obscure), a mingw build with a newer version of > GCC is going to fail due to libstdc++ wanting an older version that > gdb's default. That is another problem with setting _WIN32_WINNT too high, yes.