From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 55066 invoked by alias); 15 Sep 2015 14:02:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 54854 invoked by uid 89); 15 Sep 2015 14:02:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-wi0-f169.google.com Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-wi0-f169.google.com) (209.85.212.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:01:59 +0000 Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so30263532wic.1 for ; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 07:01:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.180.84.99 with SMTP id x3mr7779498wiy.16.1442325715587; Tue, 15 Sep 2015 07:01:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from E107787-LIN ([195.154.84.196]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ww8sm21317589wjb.4.2015.09.15.07.01.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Sep 2015 07:01:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Yao Qi To: Antoine Tremblay Cc: Yao Qi , Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Support tracepoints and software breakpoints on ARM aarch32-linux in GDBServer. References: <1441973603-15247-1-git-send-email-antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com> <867fnt5lz4.fsf@gmail.com> <55F6CA63.5000001@ericsson.com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:02:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <55F6CA63.5000001@ericsson.com> (Antoine Tremblay's message of "Mon, 14 Sep 2015 09:23:47 -0400") Message-ID: <86bnd33ho3.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg00326.txt.bz2 Antoine Tremblay writes: > Yes I could separate the two, my main reason to go with them both was > that I could not test the breakpoints if I did not have software > single step. > > I'll separate them. Thanks. > >>> >>> This patchset teaches this to GDBServer and enables support for >>> tracepoints and >>> software breakpoints. >> >> Support tracepoint on ARM (with software single step in GDBserver side) >> can be the third part. > > This is already a separate patch, namely 7/7. > Patch 7/7 does more than supporting tracepoint. Tracepoint support should be done in one patch, and this patch is only about tracepoint suppor= t. > Did you meant to create a patchset for it ? > > I guess I could separate the patch in maybe 2 or 3 but isn't it better > to keep it inside the patchset otherwise we will have to sync 3 > patchsets versions since they depend on each other ? How about starting from software breakpoint on ARM-linux GDBserver? It doesn't depends on tracepoints. After this patch set is reviewed and committed, you can post tracepoint patch set. --=20 Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)