From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 55079 invoked by alias); 23 May 2016 13:12:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 54610 invoked by uid 89); 23 May 2016 13:12:30 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*r:sk:36.2016, Hx-languages-length:245 X-HELO: mail-pa0-f66.google.com Received: from mail-pa0-f66.google.com (HELO mail-pa0-f66.google.com) (209.85.220.66) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 23 May 2016 13:12:28 +0000 Received: by mail-pa0-f66.google.com with SMTP id f8so6104055pag.0 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 06:12:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jBr/TKnunMQeRYVb/t3ZIxyMOePpMNX4J7CCHujMST8=; b=i/ykuaOzhzvBndVv20jp1HzXQjcU6O7uwR64UYgh1iqK5GmDDN4nzR1BXaMhgQC/ph /6lk79ZEODSXW1XTDtQtH9MHMBG/4ChPMFBI3GdM0I6qZ+W55g0gSQJcOK8QQeiT25nf +tbghhm+eIJbch8hjfrj5gNxISjeeikEQx/ezZ9Y1ygIA4dKduOTgUn0B5amvnVoxI0q HANKnRGSlK85bbuD3dtIBWe4PHzeMexoRCM3FfRmK5hPjQzT4f5IPXsZhfF9faVut83E MTweyVQwvy6qurI02GWSzHa0suAKyVtNVLJC1QnxsIML2RZ8T00Dun3gXdJHGMfaZsqA E2Sg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVkBvTvUar7TICWdKFmAVPKZuu4J9TOtvPdSqE64v/kpF/9PZAwwqZpVizjINIhxQ== X-Received: by 10.66.222.3 with SMTP id qi3mr27221618pac.24.1464009147146; Mon, 23 May 2016 06:12:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from E107787-LIN (gcc113.osuosl.org. [140.211.9.71]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lg17sm37628293pab.36.2016.05.23.06.12.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 23 May 2016 06:12:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Yao Qi To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] [Linux] Optimize PID -> struct lwp_info lookup References: <1463669290-30415-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <1463669290-30415-5-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 13:12:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1463669290-30415-5-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Thu, 19 May 2016 15:48:08 +0100") Message-ID: <86d1oc7wb4.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-05/txt/msg00386.txt.bz2 Pedro Alves writes: > Fix this by keeping a list of LWPs sorted by PID, so we can use binary > searches for lookup. Is it better to use htab? --=20 Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)