From: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 00/15] Remove regcache::m_readonly_p
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 16:18:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86fu75g4l5.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1512125286-29788-1-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org> (Yao Qi's message of "Fri, 1 Dec 2017 10:47:51 +0000")
Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com> writes:
> regcache is used in many places in gdb in different ways, so regcache
> becomes a flat and fat object. That exposes some unnecessary APIs to
> different part, and some APIs are misused or abused:
>
> 1) gdbarch methods pseudo_register_read and pseudo_register_read_value
> have a parameter 'regcache *', but these two gdbarch methods only need
> raw_read* and cooked_read* methods. So it is better to pass a class
> which only has raw_read* and cooked_read* methods, and other regcache
> methods are invisible to each gdbarch implementation.
>
> 2) target_ops methods to_fetch_registers and to_store_registers have a
> parameter 'regcache *', but these two target_ops methods only need
> raw_supply and raw_collect methods, because raw registers are from target
> layer, pseudo registers are "composed" or "created" by gdbarch.
>
> 3) jit.c uses regcache in an odd way, and record-full.c should use
> a simple version regcache instead of an array (see patch 11)
>
> Beside these api issues, one issue in regcache is that there is no
> type or class for readonly regcache. We use a flag field m_readonly_p
> to indicate the regcache is readonly or not, so some regcache apis have
> assert that this regcache is or is not readonly. The better way to do
> this is to create a new class for readonly regcache which doesn't have
> write methods at all.
>
> This patch series fixes all of the problems above except 2) (I had a
> patch to fix 2 in my tree, but still need more time to polish it.) by
> designing a class hierarchy about regcache, like this,
>
> reg_buffer
> ^
> |
> ------+-----
> ^
> |
> regcache_read
> ^
> |
> ------+------
> ^ ^
> | |
> reg_buffer_rw regcache_readonly
> ^
> |
> regcache
>
> Class reg_buffer is a simple class, having register contents and status
> (in patch 7). regcache_read is an abstract class only having raw_read*
> and cooked_read* methods (in patch 8). reg_buffer_rw is a class which
> has read and write methods, but it disconnects from target, IOW, the
> write doesn't go through. Class regcache_readonly is the readonly
> regcache, created from regcache::save method.
>
> This patch series is tested on {x86_64, aarch64, ppc64}-linux. It is
> an RFC, want to get comments. I write them in at least seven different
> ways, and this one is satisfying. I don't push them in until 8.1 is
> branched.
Ping. I'd like to know what do you think of this design, patches 7/15
to 15/15.
--
Yao (齐尧)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-16 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-01 10:48 Yao Qi
2017-12-01 10:48 ` [PATCH 01/15] Call cooked_read in ppu2spu_prev_register Yao Qi
2018-01-16 16:19 ` Yao Qi
2018-01-16 18:05 ` Ulrich Weigand
2018-01-18 12:22 ` Yao Qi
2017-12-01 10:48 ` [PATCH 09/15] Remove regcache_save and regcache_cpy Yao Qi
2017-12-01 10:48 ` [PATCH 04/15] Replace regcache_raw_read with regcache->raw_read Yao Qi
2017-12-01 10:48 ` [PATCH 13/15] No longer create readonly regcache Yao Qi
2017-12-01 10:48 ` [PATCH 08/15] class regcache_read and Pass regcache_read to gdbarch methods Yao Qi
2018-01-23 21:51 ` Simon Marchi
2018-01-23 22:28 ` Yao Qi
2017-12-01 10:48 ` [PATCH 15/15] Move register_dump to regcache-dump.c Yao Qi
2017-12-01 10:48 ` [PATCH 03/15] Remove mt port Yao Qi
2017-12-01 10:48 ` [PATCH 05/15] regcache_cooked_read -> regcache->cooked_read Yao Qi
2017-12-01 10:48 ` [PATCH 02/15] Don't call gdbarch_pseudo_register_read_value in jit.c Yao Qi
2017-12-01 10:48 ` [PATCH 10/15] Class regcache_readonly Yao Qi
2018-01-24 3:05 ` Simon Marchi
2018-01-24 9:43 ` Yao Qi
2018-01-24 16:57 ` Simon Marchi
2018-01-24 17:37 ` Yao Qi
2018-01-24 18:01 ` Simon Marchi
2018-01-24 21:01 ` Yao Qi
2017-12-01 10:48 ` [PATCH 07/15] Class reg_buffer Yao Qi
2017-12-01 10:48 ` [PATCH 12/15] Replace regcache::dump with class register_dump Yao Qi
2017-12-01 10:48 ` [PATCH 06/15] regcache::cooked_write test Yao Qi
2018-01-18 16:13 ` Simon Marchi
2018-01-22 11:12 ` Yao Qi
2017-12-01 10:48 ` [PATCH 14/15] Remove regcache::m_readonly_p Yao Qi
2017-12-01 10:48 ` [PATCH 11/15] Class reg_buffer_rw Yao Qi
2018-01-16 16:18 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2018-01-18 16:56 ` [RFC 00/15] Remove regcache::m_readonly_p Simon Marchi
2018-01-22 14:58 ` Yao Qi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86fu75g4l5.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).