public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: one week to go until GDB 7.11 branch creation...
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 16:32:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86fuxsrz38.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160118034414.GG4059@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of	"Mon, 18 Jan 2016 07:44:14 +0400")

Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> writes:

Hi Joel,

> If there are other issues we are not aware of, please let us know!

Here are some issues,

 - some fails in test cases added by fort_dyn_array patch on some OS and
   targets.  I reported them here
   https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-01/msg00467.html
   and the original patch is
   https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-10/msg00085.html

 - PR 19491, fail in gdb.base/multi-forks.exp

 - GDB sets breakpoint on the wrong place, if the file basename is
   identical to the current file basename.  PR 19474.
   I posted a patch
   https://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2015-12/msg00321.html
   but it causes a regression.

 - As a result of the previous bug, GDB crashes in gdb.base/dprintf.exp.
   I posted a patch
   https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-01/msg00323.html
   to avoid GDB crash.

 - A regression in trunk about arm stepping out of signal handler, patch
   is posted https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2016-01/msg00377.html
   and I'll push it in after the regression testing.

 - A fail in gdb.threads/interrupted-hand-call.exp

  $ make check RUNTESTFLAGS='--target_board=remote-gdbserver-on-localhost interrupted-hand-call.exp'

  (gdb) PASS: gdb.threads/interrupted-hand-call.exp: dummy frame popped
  continue^M
  Continuing.^M
  FAIL: gdb.threads/interrupted-hand-call.exp: continue until exit (timeout)
  Remote debugging from host 127.0.0.1^M
  ptrace(regsets_fetch_inferior_registers) PID=9710: No such process^M
  ptrace(regsets_fetch_inferior_registers) PID=9710: No such process^

  I suspect it is about a GDB PR about disappeared inferior, but I can't
  find the PR in bugzilla.  I'll look into it.

I'll update https://www.sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/GDB_7.11_Release later.

-- 
Yao (齐尧)

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-20 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-18  3:44 Joel Brobecker
2016-01-20 16:32 ` Yao Qi [this message]
2016-01-21 10:05   ` Joel Brobecker
2016-01-21 15:10     ` Yao Qi
2016-01-21 15:22       ` Pedro Alves
2016-01-21 15:24         ` Pedro Alves

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86fuxsrz38.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).