public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yao Qi <qiyaoltc@gmail.com>
To: Bernhard Heckel <bernhard.heckel@intel.com>
Cc: qiyaoltc@gmail.com,  gdb-patches@sourceware.org,  brobecker@adacore.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] testsuite: Support detection of Intel compilers via test_compiler_version.
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 15:00:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86k2jylxxu.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460724297-23523-2-git-send-email-bernhard.heckel@intel.com>	(Bernhard Heckel's message of "Fri, 15 Apr 2016 14:44:56 +0200")

Bernhard Heckel <bernhard.heckel@intel.com> writes:

> Add Intel specific preprocessor macros to query the version of the compiler.
>

Looks you query the version of c/c++ compiler, and use it for fortran.
Can we assume that fortran compiler's version is the same as the c/c++
compiler version?  In an extreme case, user can set c compiler to icc,
and set fortran compiler to gfortran.

Looks we've already had such assumption in ada, that is, we determine
ada compiler version by the c compiler, so I am OK to do the same for
fortran.

> --- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/compiler.cc
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/compiler.cc
> @@ -44,3 +44,15 @@ set compiler_info [join {armcc __ARMCC_VERSION} -]
>  #if defined (__clang__)
>  set compiler_info [join {clang __clang_major__ __clang_minor__ __clang_patchlevel__} -]
>  #endif
> +
> +#if defined (__ICC)
> +set icc_major [string range __ICC 0 1]
> +set icc_minor [format "%d" [string range __ICC 2 [expr {[string length __ICC] -1}]]]
> +set icc_update __INTEL_COMPILER_UPDATE
> +set compiler_info [join "icc $icc_major $icc_minor $icc_update" -]
> +#elif defined (__ICL)
> +set icc_major [string range __ICL 0 1]
> +set icc_minor [format "%d" [string range __ICL 2 [expr {[string length __ICL] -1}]]]
> +set icc_update __INTEL_COMPILER_UPDATE
> +set compiler_info [join "icc $icc_major $icc_minor $icc_update" -]
> +#endif

Do we really need the change to compiler.cc?  Since we query the info of
compilers for different languages through c compiler, we don't need the
change compiler.cc unless we need to know the compiler info in some c++
tests.

> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
> index 1ef6a96..75c5e68 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/lib/gdb.exp
> @@ -3553,6 +3553,9 @@ proc gdb_compile_shlib {sources dest options} {
>                  lappend obj_options "additional_flags=-fpic"
>              }
>          }
> +        "icc-*" {
> +                lappend obj_options "additional_flags=-fpic"
> +        }

Why do we need this change?  How is it related to this patch series?

-- 
Yao (齐尧)

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-15 15:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-15 12:46 [PATCH V2 0/2] fortran: Testsuite, fix different type naming across compilers Bernhard Heckel
2016-04-15 12:47 ` [PATCH V2 1/2] testsuite: Support detection of Intel compilers via test_compiler_version Bernhard Heckel
2016-04-15 15:00   ` Yao Qi [this message]
2016-04-18  6:26     ` Heckel, Bernhard
2016-04-18  9:29       ` Yao Qi
2016-04-15 12:47 ` [PATCH V2 2/2] fortran: Testsuite, fix different type naming across compilers Bernhard Heckel
2016-04-15 14:41   ` Yao Qi
2016-04-18  7:15     ` Heckel, Bernhard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86k2jylxxu.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=qiyaoltc@gmail.com \
    --cc=bernhard.heckel@intel.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).