From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 422EE3858C98 for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2024 12:39:31 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 422EE3858C98 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 422EE3858C98 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2001:470:142:3::10 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1712234373; cv=none; b=KeQrtZuR+Ig6wOfXBGTMDM4hn3nxG+TcbzjqVJxt1JsU8MQRb9oNfNP9urp7VQvj2rKOGCiO8BO45Q+e/xn6Xxf7Dryx3ZbIYTbsP2Flf+7aDqZB22dQwcJZqT4kBKi2+TnJH+W7o/Mn/ex+ioskN6lMQ2lhBJ+YFsWLESKnnEg= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1712234373; c=relaxed/simple; bh=lCjGDj/FMBUefKAY35gEUip85tjGlf03OVFdKcHrO/c=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:Message-Id:From:To:Subject; b=XjaIZHrB3wn2tuKp4HiXbBID2Uvu5hlQuyJHB0N3mlxnWcfeMSURBmKegk1cjV2JJr9BdmPtMLdV8iJKVhk9reSdkGBxg6BMRzk8k8cGikrrIVLYHUrDShkvpFpp5dzl5jmgNGBT2yxBPA6qhEkPx4sKx0SHFBMKGYtQYwXsr+g= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rsMNO-0003Fv-HR; Thu, 04 Apr 2024 08:39:30 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=EDdR8YJPD65aUJ4spoU8iptNsFzOVCKIcinhuP3mI0g=; b=DLNjkQe12Xgq zAxsibC6UawONtbC1QDpWGCR35fB5Yz7ZOM9QoU7mG24OKy+18KmkDiDaB1IcwOlIgd6AeXzYeHbJ QDW2cn3gfq7UgUjRDieSlopK1SLU8JtTMoMyM4Gmi9robGZSOJ1T0jTrGyFoH4aoe3hFdgGNR1QK1 +VbOVYEPROKEuxv4wJ3Cwuh08jTN+08NvXLH94Dvo+oNIBGUdeT3BZvFLbvT9odnyKrviJSvrp7UZ CUlTB1koW125572sPbHG/z5l/y2ptW7UrFbg/hgca2Hf5Mo3J6ByBwaUGZJQ6+h+I+G3XfiooltTg ogDtk/iyqORJVAANVBaXNA==; Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 15:39:22 +0300 Message-Id: <86le5t7151.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Guinevere Larsen Cc: markus.t.metzger@intel.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org, achronop@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <7d497864-4bef-4f95-bab5-1bf9cbee7000@redhat.com> (message from Guinevere Larsen on Thu, 4 Apr 2024 09:16:46 -0300) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change message when reaching end of reverse history. References: <20240313204830.2521708-1-achronop@gmail.com> <50e7e7f5-024b-4ac8-be5c-948ad2f41e73@redhat.com> <8634s18vdh.fsf@gnu.org> <7d497864-4bef-4f95-bab5-1bf9cbee7000@redhat.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2024 09:16:46 -0300 > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, achronop@gmail.com > From: Guinevere Larsen > > > If the above makes no sense, would someone please explain in more > > detail what was the original issue, and I will try to come up with a > > better suggestion. > > > The original issue is that when a user is in replay mode going forward, > and they hit the message "no more reverse-execution history", some > interpret that message as 'you can no longer execute forward' instead of > the intended 'if you continue executing, we will do new things and > record them, instead of just replaying what was already done'. Then how about this instead: End of recorded history; following steps will be added to history.