From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 97527 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2015 07:42:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 97511 invoked by uid 89); 5 Aug 2015 07:42:35 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mail-pa0-f53.google.com Received: from mail-pa0-f53.google.com (HELO mail-pa0-f53.google.com) (209.85.220.53) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 07:42:34 +0000 Received: by padck2 with SMTP id ck2so29542743pad.0 for ; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:42:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.68.215.97 with SMTP id oh1mr16817468pbc.67.1438760552272; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:42:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from E107787-LIN (gcc1-power7.osuosl.org. [140.211.15.137]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v10sm1765397pbs.19.2015.08.05.00.42.30 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:42:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Yao Qi To: Kevin Buettner Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove get_thread_id References: <1438260744-14116-1-git-send-email-yao.qi@linaro.org> <20150804173043.GK4777@adacore.com> <20150804145710.6960cec1@pinnacle.lan> Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 07:42:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20150804145710.6960cec1@pinnacle.lan> (Kevin Buettner's message of "Tue, 4 Aug 2015 14:57:10 -0700") Message-ID: <86oaimchaz.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00102.txt.bz2 Kevin Buettner writes: >> I'm not a specialist, but I tend to agree. I've always found >> these GET_THREAD_ID macros, in particular, but be unecessary >> and obfuscating. > > Yao's patch looks good to me too. Joel and Kevin, thanks for the review. I push it in. --=20 Yao (=E9=BD=90=E5=B0=A7)