From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D65CE38708E0 for ; Sun, 12 May 2024 03:44:14 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org D65CE38708E0 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org D65CE38708E0 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2001:470:142:3::10 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1715485455; cv=none; b=Sp7vQBT3SkqDomGfrYf4d8mjKeXjf5rqGIdwyAS97wuaAhZ8tTFgbhgcfKuoOgY7O9ls2gHuX7nmsqZsZHS2JFKJvXShZuLpaB04tGkjPexKRV6pMg8SUwajc99wQtmkiF+HawArE4qoJGhxDuTCjqqOeHvaOPlOK3ZY0/0jAR0= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1715485455; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MrrEyUg6xAg9+LdBA8Z87rZ3rezij092OAxrbeFfDLQ=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:Message-Id:From:To:Subject; b=pTvK/6Kq5zc2xGc2jPspnW15a0WZ03pCk6lGjdttCQMsMTBouy6swl9aiR2bFq+naVt218ga/dN7SDdPbTG72wqgCA1/dBb/Up0RR3YDch9Ildhm+nheWClV92GnMXqGbstDd+7VdyVwcsKGvTD92S/ZmTPTV7d3/YQi5sw0QX8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1s52ss-0005ya-9E; Thu, 09 May 2024 08:28:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=EvzfqBlpVrRdNBoTs5CT5nMOfVPmXQq9XR/qgcQ5dlE=; b=E6hy2knfPod/ zupptNQQOlL1vX4IqSuqfBBwPwPDE53hgW0X77C6fynM2QA8JvqYM3pElHeZOrGzgbsAVJi4Zb5Ji UKdtcs8XV8HNIQbpggFHnDuzS8gzD5asaJkl1yqgbUH/rwU4tgrMycs85XmfisJAu26yJgN6QgH1s eiHaFvkb61U+o1HUorVqsRX2P98jyC22X6VpuowFK7N8+Q5jWrzpdS1du6sOUzEHrIqzv8wJS1vr6 sWlq7RBwinP/sdcN/ytOoQfJ9f2QVQb3lzCstYNszjXWJgUnBnmrpjFr5Z99dOVlfbzUN3gNHHtpm dJXn1MxPNRKiCO0GuwT8rA==; Date: Thu, 09 May 2024 15:28:22 +0300 Message-Id: <86pltv5fvd.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: Pedro Alves Cc: ssbssa@yahoo.de, gdb-patches@sourceware.org In-Reply-To: (message from Pedro Alves on Thu, 9 May 2024 12:47:19 +0100) Subject: Re: [PATCH 31/34 v1.3] Windows gdb+gdbserver: Check whether DBG_REPLY_LATER is available References: <20240507234233.371123-1-pedro@palves.net> <20240507234233.371123-32-pedro@palves.net> <86edaca2wi.fsf@gnu.org> <2059403191.787933.1715249225936@mail.yahoo.com> <86zfsz5kly.fsf@gnu.org> <02cbb5f5-c652-4d90-b328-853542e16557@palves.net> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > Date: Thu, 9 May 2024 12:47:19 +0100 > From: Pedro Alves > Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org > > I tried Win11, and I get the same result as Hannes on Win10. > > Here is the updated patch with that approach, then. Thanks a lot for discovering this. LGTM, thanks.