From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17FE53857C4A for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2024 13:11:17 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 17FE53857C4A Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gnu.org ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 17FE53857C4A Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2001:470:142:3::10 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1709817078; cv=none; b=O+He6sS2Ee+ccM4VeJWepDeGjeKhQ0pVTZ3Zi57GU18U0x4V5gfC8Lf0lPR79b1WxXriVH7jZekuaeZh2UZtzwVmJT0E0cwc4ICkYNLs7VtFWC8ceOvle6Lj0oyJUg3Ihrl9PmqcFEDSNbCyi0yD7gN1OlB330lnaG6qNglaqro= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1709817078; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zgCOLEWgzr8tVtcxiOLHPNdUoeVNIeVoYpy6SEzmYKc=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:Message-Id:From:To:Subject; b=kzhp5qsdJKFgpVl9R5k75aCONATf0uoijSsbaYw09CL40DUmBtWoMUCYiIJjR1hiHPpGreV/I7dfi0DTlw00y2SHk64b0aznukF542Y2QasQoYEx8VRu5ae5Kr05kDC9GBghJWDcwFgQ6mT6HnMPHGqcHoFGTFlT/lzPQLw4ngE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1riDWm-0002WM-8w; Thu, 07 Mar 2024 08:11:16 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=QmZvBp8TMkOncP+tSR8qZb4oXa1HQxJRtxwNDgoRP80=; b=UmvY3kY86dbQ WEq5+XDyjKYJbPgSSNNCoEsODH4E6b9DxwLmkGaGlfdW/jbd4oucnvISCEkeYn8CmTrfBHLRD+NUv 3RXWrpOdaq5PLPYKTW729c48sgqBPlaTSxyvQzBUX1hdV8NuhNN1Wh9jF1wfrxKPWc2NwAd8XZ7su ZCJoheXev526IbpjfoU+tZ1llFAh5TvnLI4n3OcgarbV/XxpC3a3elH7W6+SAv2KMfoNJa7H+kV/m MunvU83QucvrkK9/NAe2My5O421/EwK/W1UmHkg80MKUBkkRo+VLAqybawer8OcPfxPh+7J3T7urA rgSqn65VKwVtmLw8bgbOnQ==; Date: Thu, 07 Mar 2024 15:10:57 +0200 Message-Id: <86y1au1926.fsf@gnu.org> From: Eli Zaretskii To: "Schimpe, Christina" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, brobecker@adacore.com In-Reply-To: (christina.schimpe@intel.com) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] gdb: Deprecate MPX commands. References: <20240307121111.2010241-1-christina.schimpe@intel.com> <86zfva1aqs.fsf@gnu.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > From: "Schimpe, Christina" > CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" , > "brobecker@adacore.com" > Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2024 12:40:08 +0000 > > > "Will be removed" or "might be removed"? IOW, are we certain we will > > definitely remove this, or do we just want to warn users that we might? > > Our goal would be to deprecate the MPX commands for gdb 15, if possible. > Please let me know if there is a problem with that or if there is something required to track this properly for gdb 15. I am not familiar with the procedure. I am adding Joel due to that to this conversation. > > We would like to remove MPX for gdb 16. So yes, we certainly will remove MPX. Hopefully for gdb 16 already. That's fine by me. I just know from experience that deprecated features can stay in GDB for many years, sometimes indefinitely. But if we indeed intend to remove the command, the text you proposed for the manual is okay. Thanks.