From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 843FB3858D28 for ; Mon, 1 May 2023 14:33:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 843FB3858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1682951622; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=L/+hvz0ZcL+yz+XEk1JIV9X++rl3Y8/opDRN4FPBLIg=; b=P8NPkEgdRF46vGWjOXacPv2ukjTFg5UIkag9Ag/igDpLKSD90cdnhZrC3POFGsN9AS+n0C hN0zGb6IpXdyJBUz8CI7N0INH58dooF4UWhwXLIWXcQPpWG62HbDHLvuCP9URoSpxi1IOz tGLH8krZezG3QySVGO3/g+cDEvdMe30= Received: from mail-wr1-f69.google.com (mail-wr1-f69.google.com [209.85.221.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-59-OiwRrAITN_G7_2y7iX3Acg-1; Mon, 01 May 2023 10:33:19 -0400 X-MC-Unique: OiwRrAITN_G7_2y7iX3Acg-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f69.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-2f479aeddc4so1611435f8f.2 for ; Mon, 01 May 2023 07:33:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1682951594; x=1685543594; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=L/+hvz0ZcL+yz+XEk1JIV9X++rl3Y8/opDRN4FPBLIg=; b=XtVmfivBawbktKEdILl/XA0Q3fLpdO6Gw8LAjsyxhLo5EN9bIs3SFiPALc3gNYR/eC CVLaXjygxQFVhEPkbNkx/az6brizLb1bPiubdod0yDzTyh833PMFTHGy1dQ+5046Gl0h deRvnN/UOHsmdwqt95SbRtPy8+08Bz3tfCXoWlrLSAd8xfuMWRNzN/Sf60+y6lLdn/JL SbGcVGlw/elCXYGOfdtXPqJ/QLLptrmap/n1/DUGWk6FnGuibksbMXz0cyQDxc/9Xoh+ pwkbg8vHO/k1Enxwr8FV68IMueh/3d1ebJvaHDHTFpIrx8n/gIh22T484SGKareTTyoV UXUg== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxyzbS0Kb7x39yticVQ0xr0TDCjbSwBK7o+jxh570ovorCsl6pR 0bJr3A8DvFuSS1UAmpzRScDe+LU5h6wPxTDaGofxscApYrhKNiFRvk3BPcGBtcNFv7veGT4xUZq rVAMzXH7CIOsX+ikCuIU57NBXDKHP5w== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6dc4:0:b0:2fa:36db:8060 with SMTP id d4-20020a5d6dc4000000b002fa36db8060mr10045344wrz.60.1682951594316; Mon, 01 May 2023 07:33:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5nYknFv/eHEHU4DadNJbeSodL/G5AUkNDMB3oP4m5o7RqcCSoV+BhuxGzdFWCJIdVZywT2ZQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6dc4:0:b0:2fa:36db:8060 with SMTP id d4-20020a5d6dc4000000b002fa36db8060mr10045331wrz.60.1682951593984; Mon, 01 May 2023 07:33:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (11.72.115.87.dyn.plus.net. [87.115.72.11]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a14-20020adfe5ce000000b002fbe0772ab1sm28290134wrn.16.2023.05.01.07.33.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 01 May 2023 07:33:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Burgess To: Tom de Vries , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] gdb/testsuite: change newline patterns used in gdb_test In-Reply-To: <7552d3ad-c148-f0ea-b219-dd2d9458de0c@suse.de> References: <464e64e3a3483c228f0a73c778bcaf79e4595abd.1680293848.git.aburgess@redhat.com> <7552d3ad-c148-f0ea-b219-dd2d9458de0c@suse.de> Date: Mon, 01 May 2023 15:33:12 +0100 Message-ID: <871qk09l5j.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Tom de Vries writes: > On 3/31/23 22:20, Andrew Burgess via Gdb-patches wrote: >> This commit makes two changes to how we match newline characters in >> the gdb_test proc. > > Hi, > > the -wrap used in gdb_test_multiple is defined in terms of gdb_test > semantics, but it doesn't seem to have been updated to match the new > behaviour in gdb_test. > > I've filed a PR about this regression ( > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30403 ). Sorry for any problems caused. I'm not working today, but if this has not been addressed, I'll look at this on Tuesday. Thanks, Andrew