From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22112 invoked by alias); 9 Jan 2014 17:07:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22096 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jan 2014 17:07:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jan 2014 17:07:08 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s09H740A005916 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 9 Jan 2014 12:07:04 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-85.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.85]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s09H72YG002748 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Jan 2014 12:07:03 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Reini Urban Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Joel Brobecker Subject: Re: GDB 7.6.90 available for testing References: <20140108101428.C2280E003F@joel.gnat.com> <52CD9682.2060805@cpanel.net> Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 17:07:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <52CD9682.2060805@cpanel.net> (Reini Urban's message of "Wed, 08 Jan 2014 12:18:42 -0600") Message-ID: <871u0haxu1.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00241.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Reini" == Reini Urban writes: Reini> I got those FAIL regressions from 7.6.50: [...] Reini> on an uptodate debian testing amd64. Reini> I hope you can replicate that. I checked out and built the 7.7 branch here. I then spot-checked my results against yours -- I did not check every test, but a reasonable subset of them. My build did not have any of the failures you are seeing. Offhand I don't know what went wrong in your test run. I guess you'd have to look into gdb.log to find out. Joel, I did notice this -- not a regression, but a new test that fails: gdb.ada/mi_interface.exp: Create ggg1 varobj: FAIL gdb.ada/mi_interface.exp: list ggg1's children: FAIL >From gdb.log: -var-create ggg1 * ggg1 ^error,msg="-var-create: unable to create variable object" (gdb) I didn't dig any deeper though. Tom