From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDE543858409 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:53:50 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org BDE543858409 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1674662030; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rW8LwnJb+XF0aFOdOAaXdyJ7mBieVSQgCdvogPbT7S4=; b=XeyYLjJtCHPxIdmz56wcG8zFDb6m8e1NtzfZwwdjwct3/QsO3IRtGm4pxoZocTHnbeJ/Zk A9HKcUOD4Zoem/tKpgOEiHLjBYv5T8q2mFCJ6fCLGVpYJWA2QIcwPHM1RW5LTqK/8wotUD 2cedZojzehZw5ZcZe3nxexfawgN6Fgc= Received: from mail-qk1-f198.google.com (mail-qk1-f198.google.com [209.85.222.198]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id us-mta-595-g6fA12ldOrKnW4mtYdsJXA-1; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 10:53:49 -0500 X-MC-Unique: g6fA12ldOrKnW4mtYdsJXA-1 Received: by mail-qk1-f198.google.com with SMTP id bj28-20020a05620a191c00b007068d8b5051so13163418qkb.14 for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 07:53:49 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:to:from :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=rW8LwnJb+XF0aFOdOAaXdyJ7mBieVSQgCdvogPbT7S4=; b=huR0dfIvcsOGfFhgV6TnbFDhyj++n/g3DTMmRlTa7IaZf0pS8idQNQzomgSD+4Syqt FzxkIcsKt1MPQylM1kgsNyUO5wsddyyLl7KS+A0b4QuZlZl0xeJpSJN0n6glpNVd2H+Q lJ7NTN7YkF0Up1YdOFIQu9OKISNEo9w5kLNE5z6Lp5iX8sc/vaaSx8oox7YM6ndyzu6U 7eZ+WT1WgeaySyIyskdC6gBlOld7IIZLxK6DlCNm1ATWT+DTPuIzgiuQfyBEqHJsXAP+ 9qYzY5WMkWLbPSRyhSIjbtvxfUaRT79gaFfFESvb/6ZMuK2VCJ8rMPJHyiiS/xk59c2u Gtig== X-Gm-Message-State: AFqh2kpzwdMmmvAqwClOYWq74MtGvlfzIvLsxwGG3Zahwtl14f+gwyEk m/ujorh9sxlafk93mdnNV1U2a2TXtqJ/eE2G68jCvp/m0/lwRN8RVrCEO9QocrS+ee2XTwQ1ak1 qJX5ngkWOBer/8z01Hl4oig== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:5a8c:b0:3b6:2c58:cbcf with SMTP id fz12-20020a05622a5a8c00b003b62c58cbcfmr53017220qtb.4.1674662028493; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 07:53:48 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMrXdXvpXT1NYDxs3iATQEFnlJ17ScuuZ+IrJzAZzG9rhrX7LcPQbrctTCImMru9r0Q8qjC++bh5eA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:5a8c:b0:3b6:2c58:cbcf with SMTP id fz12-20020a05622a5a8c00b003b62c58cbcfmr53017203qtb.4.1674662028252; Wed, 25 Jan 2023 07:53:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (95.72.115.87.dyn.plus.net. [87.115.72.95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b11-20020ac801cb000000b003b6953fbb8fsm2234972qtg.32.2023.01.25.07.53.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 25 Jan 2023 07:53:47 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Burgess To: "Aktemur, Tankut Baris" , "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" Subject: RE: [PATCHv2 00/13] Infcalls from B/P conditions in multi-threaded inferiors In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 15:53:46 +0000 Message-ID: <87357ywqyd.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: "Aktemur, Tankut Baris" writes: > On Wednesday, January 18, 2023 5:18 PM, Andrew Burgess wrote: >> Thanks for the feedback on V1. I merged a couple of the really minor >> patches from the V1 series, but after the feedback I'm some new >> patches in the v2 series. >> >> In V2: >> >> - Rebased onto something closer to HEAD of master, >> >> - Patches #1, #2, #12, and #13 are new in this series, >> >> - Patches #3 to #9, and #11 are unchanged since their V1 iteration, >> >> - Patches #10 has changed slightly in implementation since v1, and >> the docs have been significantly updated. > > I've looked at the series and posted my comments. Thanks for doing this. > > Is there a chance to push the branch to somewhere? Git am does not > work very well for my setup. Hi! Thanks for looking through, I've pushed the branch to users/aburgess/bp-inferior-calls. I'll go through your feedback and make any updates needed and force push this branch. Thanks, Andrew