public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Cc: Bruno Larsen <blarsen@redhat.com>,
	 Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] gdb: add prepare_reinflate/reinflate around print_frame_args in info_frame_command_core
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2022 12:39:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <875yfp44nr.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <85e999de-64c7-37f9-2fcf-d6ce01d1baf5@polymtl.ca> (Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches's message of "Tue, 8 Nov 2022 10:55:21 -0500")

>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:

Simon> But this shows how the current frame_info_ptr is error-prone: you have
Simon> two know which functions can, deep down their call tree, reinit the
Simon> frame cache.  And all their callers that have a frame_info_ptr object,
Simon> recursively, must explicitly do prepare_reinflate / reinflate to protect
Simon> themselves against their frame_info object being invalidated.  It's very
Simon> easy to forget some spots.

Yeah.  This problem already existed, and the rationale behind
frame_info_ptr wasn't to fix it, but rather to expose it when it happens
-- by crashing rather than allowing a UAF.

Simon> I'm currently working on making frame_info_ptr work automatically,
Simon> meaning it would grab the wrapped frame id automatically on
Simon> construction, and reinflate the frame automatically if needed

We tried this a bit, but the problem we hit was that computing the
frame id require unwinding a bit, and since the code generally uses
frame_info_ptr everywhere, gdb would end up unwinding everything.

If this can be overcome then that would be great.

Tom

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-08 19:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-07 15:53 [PATCH 1/7] gdb: clear other.m_cached_id in frame_info_ptr's move ctor Simon Marchi
2022-11-07 15:53 ` [PATCH 2/7] gdb: add prepare_reinflate/reinflate around print_frame_args in info_frame_command_core Simon Marchi
2022-11-08  9:32   ` Bruno Larsen
2022-11-08 15:55     ` Simon Marchi
2022-11-08 19:39       ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2022-11-08 19:55         ` Simon Marchi
2022-11-07 15:53 ` [PATCH 3/7] gdb: move frame_info_ptr method implementations to frame-info.c Simon Marchi
2022-11-08  9:55   ` Bruno Larsen
2022-11-08 17:39     ` Tom Tromey
2022-11-07 15:53 ` [PATCH 4/7] gdb: remove manual frame_info reinflation code in backtrace_command_1 Simon Marchi
2022-11-08 10:14   ` Bruno Larsen
2022-11-08 16:05     ` Simon Marchi
2022-11-07 15:53 ` [PATCH 5/7] gdb: use frame_id_p instead of comparing to null_frame_id in frame_info_ptr::reinflate Simon Marchi
2022-11-08 17:43   ` Tom Tromey
2022-11-07 15:53 ` [PATCH 6/7] gdb: add missing prepare_reinflate call in print_frame_info Simon Marchi
2022-11-08 10:28   ` Bruno Larsen
2022-11-08 11:31   ` Lancelot SIX
2022-11-08 16:08     ` Simon Marchi
2022-11-07 15:53 ` [PATCH 7/7] gdb: add special handling for frame level 0 in frame_info_ptr Simon Marchi
2022-11-08 10:40   ` Bruno Larsen
2022-11-08 16:19     ` Simon Marchi
2022-11-10 16:28       ` Bruno Larsen
2022-11-10 16:30         ` Simon Marchi
2022-11-08  8:53 ` [PATCH 1/7] gdb: clear other.m_cached_id in frame_info_ptr's move ctor Bruno Larsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=875yfp44nr.fsf@tromey.com \
    --to=tom@tromey.com \
    --cc=blarsen@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).