[CANCEL] [PATCH 0/3] Convert probe interfaces to C++ (and perform some cleanups)

[Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>]

On Monday, November 13 2017, I wrote:

> This patch series performs the conversion of the probe interfaces
> (generic, stap and dtrace) to C++, along with a few cleanups here and
> there to make the code conform better to our standards.

Sorry, it seems my git-format-patch messed up and generated a lot of
patches on my source tree.  Please, ignore this thread.  I will resubmit
the patches in a new thread.

> This series needs to be committed/tested as one single patch, because
> of inter-dependencies.  However, in order to facilitate the review
> process, I decided to split things into logical units.
>
> The main changes are the conversion of 'struct probe' to 'class
> probe', and 'struct probe_ops' to 'class static_probe_ops'.  Almost
> everything else in the patches are adjustments related to these
> modifications.
>
> It's important to say that 'class probe' contains the majority of the
> methods that were previously living inside 'struct probe_ops'.
> However, some methods are special in the sense the they don't act on a
> specific probe object, but generically on a probe type (like a
> factory).  For that reason the 'class static_probe_ops' had to be
> created.
>
> Most methods in 'class probe' are pure virtual and need to be defined
> by the probe backend (stap or dtrace, for now).  Other methods (e.g.,
> the 'enable' method) are virtual but non-pure and have a default,
> dummy version implemented on 'class probe' itself, because the concept
> of enabling a probe is not common to all types of probes.
>
> I've also taken the opportunity to convert a few uses of "VEC" to
> "std::vector", and to remove annoying spurious newlines from some
> places.
>
> The whole patch has been tested on BuildBot, without regressions.

-- 
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF  31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/