From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8421 invoked by alias); 19 May 2014 07:32:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 8402 invoked by uid 89); 19 May 2014 07:32:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: e06smtp17.uk.ibm.com Received: from e06smtp17.uk.ibm.com (HELO e06smtp17.uk.ibm.com) (195.75.94.113) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 19 May 2014 07:32:41 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp17.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 19 May 2014 08:32:38 +0100 Received: from d06dlp03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.20.15) by e06smtp17.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.147) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Mon, 19 May 2014 08:32:36 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by d06dlp03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C821B08051 for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 08:32:52 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.213]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id s4J7WZ3L32899128 for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 07:32:36 GMT Received: from d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id s4J7WZZv010087 for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 01:32:35 -0600 Received: from br87z6lw.de.ibm.com (dyn-9-152-212-188.boeblingen.de.ibm.com [9.152.212.188]) by d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id s4J7WY0m010048 for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 01:32:35 -0600 From: Andreas Arnez To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: [PING] [PATCH 00/11] Regset rework preparations part 1 References: <1400168975-3145-1-git-send-email-arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 07:32:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1400168975-3145-1-git-send-email-arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (Andreas Arnez's message of "Thu, 15 May 2014 17:49:24 +0200") Message-ID: <8761l28bql.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14051907-0542-0000-0000-0000090AE736 X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00328.txt.bz2 On Thu, May 15 2014, Andreas Arnez wrote: > This is the first half of the "regset rework preparations" series I've > posted as RFC: > https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-04/msg00560.html On Wed, May 14 2014, Mark Kettenis wrote: >> From: Andreas Arnez >> Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 14:13:26 +0200 >> >> Although there was feedback for some of the patches in this series >> (https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-04/msg00560.html), many are >> still uncommented. I'd really appreciate more feedback, particularly >> for the architecture-specific changes. > > Sorry, I've not been able to find time to process your reply on my > review of patch 12 yet and won't be able to for the next 1.5 weeks or > so. But perhaps you could move ahead with the diffs that don't depend > on that one which seem useful in their own right. > >> Patches 3, 4, 6, 7, 8 (AARCH64, ARM, MIPS, MN10300, and SCORE): No >> comments yet. >> >> > * Patch 9 ("SPARC: Rename register maps from "*regset" to "*regmap"): >> > Adjusts naming, to avoid name clashes in patch 10. >> >> Approved by Mark Kettenis: >> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-05/msg00038.html > > I don't really expect any response for MN10300 and SCORE. I'd give it > a few days to give people with an interest in ARM and MIPS the > opportunity to repsond, but feel free to move ahead with 3, 4, 6, 7 > and 8 after that. As suggested, I've waited a few additional days now for comments on patches 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8. Apart from those I believe everything else in this series was approved already. OK to push?