From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.23.142]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29E073858CD1 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2023 16:31:13 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 29E073858CD1 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tromey.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tromey.com Received: from cmgw12.mail.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.0.90.127]) by progateway6.mail.pro1.eigbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4AC10047D89 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2023 16:30:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id KLh2q7lyEjMtkKLh2q7OLy; Fri, 14 Jul 2023 16:30:56 +0000 X-Authority-Reason: nr=8 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=KP+fsHJo c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=64b17840 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:117 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:17 a=OWjo9vPv0XrRhIrVQ50Ab3nP57M=:19 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=ws7JD89P4LkA:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=Qbun_eYptAEA:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=CCpqsmhAAAAA:8 a=2b4MXL_E5y3oggIoEKoA:9 a=ul9cdbp4aOFLsgKbc677:22 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References :Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=sE1tFuEYnl/zEBV733ZIJ/98+Zg1d3fu9RAWAz1kn5Y=; b=F8AXN7njLW4jBjhzrPGyM68Baq 6VwB4VtvH/HQOZ/8BuaHIV+t6NmQbP59ZKNyLhTq+lXjCsz+wL4rQtI9fq0TXIFvlaJAmKlPBj2R6 KICnrmiRuOgG5BfkEFbEwKkTl; Received: from 75-166-135-140.hlrn.qwest.net ([75.166.135.140]:45544 helo=murgatroyd) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qKLh2-002J9E-0M; Fri, 14 Jul 2023 10:30:56 -0600 From: Tom Tromey To: Bruno Larsen via Gdb-patches Cc: Matt Rice , Keith Seitz , Bruno Larsen Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] gdb/doc: document '+' argument for 'list' command References: <20230713102411.2279542-1-blarsen@redhat.com> <20230713102411.2279542-5-blarsen@redhat.com> <7774b382-a663-f593-ea99-c52a8495aead@redhat.com> <05293df6-b087-5c3b-1b3f-6dcf6d14541e@redhat.com> X-Attribution: Tom Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 10:30:55 -0600 In-Reply-To: <05293df6-b087-5c3b-1b3f-6dcf6d14541e@redhat.com> (Bruno Larsen via Gdb-patches's message of "Fri, 14 Jul 2023 10:53:43 +0200") Message-ID: <877cr2o3pc.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5379.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - sourceware.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tromey.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 75.166.135.140 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1qKLh2-002J9E-0M X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: 75-166-135-140.hlrn.qwest.net (murgatroyd) [75.166.135.140]:45544 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 1 X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTM3OS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3019.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: >>>>> "Bruno" == Bruno Larsen via Gdb-patches writes: Bruno> Yeah, it does sound like some unfortunate bit of ambiguity. I'm sure Bruno> that "list +" is different to "list +[NSText initialize]" because the Bruno> code has a special case for "arg[0] == '+' && arg[1] == '\0'", so it Bruno> has to be a different case. Bruno> Would be nice if we could change this to a less ambiguous option, as Bruno> future work... I wonder if the ObjC code even works. Most of the test cases can't even be compiled, and no one has maintained it in many years -- I think since before I worked on gdb. Tom