public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: John Darrington <john@darrington.wattle.id.au>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] GDBSERVER: Listen on a unix domain (instead of TCP) socket if requested.
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 19:43:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877eidwwlz.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181019185548.izouwatbcjwnrs2a@jocasta.intra> (John	Darrington's message of "Fri, 19 Oct 2018 20:55:48 +0200")

On Friday, October 19 2018, John Darrington wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 04:18:48PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote:
>
>      > +  bool is_unix = hint->ai_family == AF_UNIX;
>      
>      No need for a newline between the declarations of is_ipv6 and is_unix.
>      
>      Here, and everywhere else, AF_UNIX may be undefined if building GDB on a
>      non-UNIX environment.  I'm afraid you may have to guard this code with
>      "HAVE_SYS_UN_H".
>      
>
> This is true.  But a quick experiment showed me that there are quite a
> few other places in gdb which has this problem.

Which places?  There are some files that are not compiled on certain
systems, so it's fine to have system-dependent code without the guards.
I don't use proprietary OSes, so the way I test here is to compile GDB
using a mingw compiler.  If it passes, then I assume things are OK.
Your patch, for example, broke the compilation (because of
AF_UNIX/AF_LOCAL).

Cheers,

-- 
Sergio
GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF  31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36
Please send encrypted e-mail if possible
http://sergiodj.net/

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-19 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-09 17:33 Gdbserver can listen on local domain sockets John Darrington
2018-10-09 17:33 ` [PATCH] GDBSERVER: Listen on a unix domain (instead of TCP) socket if requested John Darrington
2018-10-09 17:56   ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-10-09 18:02   ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-09 18:41     ` John Darrington
2018-10-09 18:53       ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-09 19:00         ` John Darrington
2018-10-09 19:06           ` Pedro Alves
2018-10-13 17:58     ` [PATCH 1/4] " John Darrington
2018-10-13 17:58       ` [PATCH 4/4] GDB: Remote target can now accept the form unix::/path/to/socket John Darrington
2018-10-13 17:58       ` [PATCH 2/4] GDB: Document the unix::/path/to/socket of remote connection John Darrington
2018-10-13 18:11         ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-10-15  9:31         ` Simon Tatham
2018-10-15 11:28           ` John Darrington
2018-10-18 20:21         ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-10-13 17:58       ` [PATCH 3/4] GDB: Fix documentation for invoking GDBSERVER John Darrington
2018-10-13 18:10         ` Eli Zaretskii
2018-10-18 20:27         ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-10-19  7:05           ` John Darrington
2018-10-19 20:45             ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-10-21  7:33               ` John Darrington
2018-10-21 16:47                 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-10-23 18:25               ` John Darrington
2018-10-23 18:58                 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-10-13 18:12       ` [PATCH 1/4] GDBSERVER: Listen on a unix domain (instead of TCP) socket if requested Eli Zaretskii
2018-10-18 20:18       ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-10-19 18:55         ` John Darrington
2018-10-19 19:43           ` Sergio Durigan Junior [this message]
2018-10-28 16:20             ` Simon Marchi
2018-10-28 18:10               ` John Darrington
2018-10-28 18:51                 ` Simon Marchi
2018-10-29  8:24                   ` John Darrington
2018-10-29  9:13                     ` Rainer Orth
2018-10-29  9:38                       ` Rainer Orth
2018-10-29 15:52                       ` Simon Marchi
2018-10-29 16:26                         ` John Darrington
2018-10-29 16:42                           ` Sergio Durigan Junior
2018-10-29 17:34                             ` John Darrington
2018-10-31 13:54                               ` Simon Marchi
2018-10-29 18:32                             ` Simon Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877eidwwlz.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=sergiodj@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=john@darrington.wattle.id.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).