From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6873 invoked by alias); 15 Jan 2014 17:03:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 6855 invoked by uid 89); 15 Jan 2014 17:03:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:03:19 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0FH3FPU011540 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:03:15 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-85.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.85]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0FH3E11011492 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Jan 2014 12:03:15 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Joel Brobecker , binutils@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: small request regarding commits in binutils-gdb.git References: <20140115121251.GM4639@adacore.com> <83mwix44gh.fsf@gnu.org> <52D6BC37.9000806@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 17:03:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <52D6BC37.9000806@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Wed, 15 Jan 2014 16:49:59 +0000") Message-ID: <877ga1rxd9.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00524.txt.bz2 Pedro> (and if it crosses the month border, it's usually harder even to Pedro> retrieve) This is a pet peeve of mine. It makes archaeology non-obvious sometimes, like when there is a multi-month gap in the discussion. I wish we had better software support for this, and for other common archaeological tasks. Tom