Re: [PATCH] gdb/doc: Consistency fixes for GDB/MI documentation

[Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> Cc: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
>> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 09:28:29 +0000
>> From: Andrew Burgess via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
>> 
>> I noticed two inconsistencies in the GDB/MI documentation, which this
>> commit addresses:
>> 
>>   1. Each MI command is introduced like this:
>> 
>>      @subheading The @code{-command-name} Command
>> 
>>      Except for a few of the tracing command, which just use:
>> 
>>      @subheading -command-name
>> 
>>      In this commit I've updated all these trace commands to use the
>>      more common format.
>> 
>>   2. Each MI command starts with a @subheading, and then the details
>>      of that command are split up using multiple @subsubheading
>>      entries.
>> 
>>      Except for a few commands which use @subheading for the top-level
>>      command, and then continue to use @subheading for each part of
>>      the command description.
>> 
>>      In this commit I've updated these to use @subsubheading where
>>      appropriate.
>> ---
>>  gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> Thanks, this belongs to the "obvious fix" department, so please
> install.
>
> Approved-By: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>

Pushed.

Thanks,
Andrew