From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from qproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (qproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.16.161]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B765385627F for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2022 16:50:04 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 0B765385627F Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tromey.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tromey.com Received: from gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.18.3]) by qproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1908039C1B for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2022 16:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cmgw13.mail.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.0.90.128]) by progateway4.mail.pro1.eigbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E08710047BAD for ; Sun, 12 Jun 2022 16:48:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id 0QlMo8QfhxkuL0QlMopjik; Sun, 12 Jun 2022 16:48:32 +0000 X-Authority-Reason: nr=8 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=VbMygHl9 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=62a618e0 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:117 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:17 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=JPEYwPQDsx4A:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=Qbun_eYptAEA:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=zstS-IiYAAAA:8 a=KXFEV5QEyyziKN2t4aAA:9 a=4G6NA9xxw8l3yy4pmD5M:22 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References :Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=y3oIwO4blY5PeoXepHeZAoj3qtdTYVKn7hZH9r1nDJU=; b=iVwLMma4HcUahMufyx4dacAUw9 CmVkmwAgEHz5inDu3pxt27L/pEC1v3EcDQ6qno+6Lue49R4g7RJI4P3d5zwIOiRKJRQMdnvIVzRSa nojPPFnvIJP4JoxbX0zR2402a; Received: from 71-211-171-143.hlrn.qwest.net ([71.211.171.143]:35082 helo=prentzel) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1o0QlL-00290Q-Vr; Sun, 12 Jun 2022 10:48:32 -0600 From: Tom Tromey To: Tom Tromey Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] C++-ify addrmap References: <20220416165821.3648899-1-tom@tromey.com> X-Attribution: Tom Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2022 10:48:31 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20220416165821.3648899-1-tom@tromey.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Sat, 16 Apr 2022 10:58:12 -0600") Message-ID: <878rq125gg.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5379.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - sourceware.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tromey.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 71.211.171.143 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1o0QlL-00290Q-Vr X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: 71-211-171-143.hlrn.qwest.net (prentzel) [71.211.171.143]:35082 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 1 X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTM3OS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3023.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2022 16:50:06 -0000 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> I did some C++-ification of addrmap for some experiments I'm doing, Tom> and I thought it would be good to clean this up and submit it instead Tom> of keeping it on some branch. Tom> Regression tested on x86-64 Fedora 34. I've rebased this and I'm checking it in now. Tom