From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA 08/12] Remove value::next and value::released
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 21:40:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878ta03tfi.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84cd5331-e9ca-dc95-6c2e-a13cd64d7137@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 6 Apr 2018 20:32:02 +0100")
>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:
Pedro> On 04/05/2018 10:15 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>> value_release_to_mark (const struct value *mark)
>> {
Pedro> ...
>> + std::reverse (result.begin (), result.end ());
>> return result;
>> }
Pedro> Is there a comment somewhere mentioning the order of the
Pedro> returned values?
Nope. value.h doesn't generally seem to have comments; but since really
it should, I've done this:
/* Release values from the value chain and return them. Values
created after MARK are released. If MARK is nullptr, or if MARK is
not found on the value chain, then all values are released. Values
are returned in reverse order of creation; that is, newest
first. */
extern std::vector<value_ref_ptr> value_release_to_mark
(const struct value *mark);
Then in value.c I added the usual:
/* See value.h. */
std::vector<value_ref_ptr>
value_release_to_mark (const struct value *mark)
{
...
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-06 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-05 21:16 [RFA 00/12] (somewhat) clean up struct value ownership Tom Tromey
2018-04-05 21:16 ` [RFA 12/12] Change value::contents to be a unique_xmalloc_ptr Tom Tromey
2018-04-05 21:16 ` [RFA 05/12] Change value history to use value_ref_ptr Tom Tromey
2018-04-05 21:16 ` [RFA 01/12] Introduce a gdb_ref_ptr specialization for struct value Tom Tromey
2018-04-06 19:29 ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-05 21:16 ` [RFA 03/12] Change last_examine_value to value_ref_ptr Tom Tromey
2018-04-05 21:16 ` [RFA 09/12] Use new and delete for values Tom Tromey
2018-04-05 21:16 ` [RFA 11/12] Remove range_s VEC Tom Tromey
2018-04-05 21:16 ` [RFA 07/12] Remove free_value_chain Tom Tromey
2018-04-05 21:16 ` [RFA 02/12] Change breakpoints to use value_ref_ptr Tom Tromey
2018-04-06 19:31 ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-06 21:31 ` Tom Tromey
2018-04-05 21:16 ` [RFA 08/12] Remove value::next and value::released Tom Tromey
2018-04-06 19:32 ` Pedro Alves
2018-04-06 21:40 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2018-04-05 21:16 ` [RFA 06/12] Remove free_all_values Tom Tromey
2018-04-05 21:16 ` [RFA 10/12] Change value::parent to a value_ref_ptr Tom Tromey
2018-04-05 21:16 ` [RFA 04/12] Change varobj to use value_ref_ptr Tom Tromey
2018-04-06 19:33 ` [RFA 00/12] (somewhat) clean up struct value ownership Pedro Alves
2018-04-06 21:20 ` Tom Tromey
2018-04-06 21:44 ` Tom Tromey
2018-04-08 21:32 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878ta03tfi.fsf@tromey.com \
--to=tom@tromey.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).