From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from progateway7-pub.mail.pro1.eigbox.com (gproxy5-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [67.222.38.55]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8FC93858D28 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 19:04:29 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org A8FC93858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tromey.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tromey.com Received: from cmgw10.mail.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.0.90.125]) by progateway7.mail.pro1.eigbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932A610044A64 for ; Fri, 7 Oct 2022 19:04:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id gsdqoKyaIGc2Egsdro5X7Q; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 19:04:15 +0000 X-Authority-Reason: nr=8 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=Cq56zl0D c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6340782f a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:117 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:17 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=Qawa6l4ZSaYA:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=Qbun_eYptAEA:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=CCpqsmhAAAAA:8 a=TafIgiW-L4G-N7fQKoUA:9 a=ul9cdbp4aOFLsgKbc677:22 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References :Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=fwfodvq4PvDviHyLpjU9GhVXxm2HSi1kQ9Mnz2uq+NM=; b=Zmdmt0qzZqFJ73/9hDiefVef2C +5Cf5CrEdfdRCWRshIKp9+TuLmbkMD2rc3l+I4xnNkZA8Zhn9Bvt5M1teWjnmvMpzFe8R45OkEiwX DtBnqg2kCi6RpA7nYSzKTRm1g; Received: from 71-211-160-49.hlrn.qwest.net ([71.211.160.49]:56618 helo=murgatroyd) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1ogsdo-00059q-Vy; Fri, 07 Oct 2022 13:04:13 -0600 From: Tom Tromey To: Andrew Burgess via Gdb-patches Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] More detailed filenames for in-memory BFD objects References: X-Attribution: Tom Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 13:04:07 -0600 In-Reply-To: (Andrew Burgess via Gdb-patches's message of "Wed, 5 Oct 2022 20:33:51 +0100") Message-ID: <87a667tpzs.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5379.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - sourceware.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tromey.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 71.211.160.49 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1ogsdo-00059q-Vy X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: 71-211-160-49.hlrn.qwest.net (murgatroyd) [71.211.160.49]:56618 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 1 X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTM3OS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3022.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2022 19:04:31 -0000 >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Burgess via Gdb-patches writes: Andrew> We currently generate a filename for every in-memory BFD object that Andrew> GDB created (as part of the JIT interface). The generated name is Andrew> "" for every symfile, which can make it hard to tell Andrew> multiple such files apart. Andrew> This series changes the generated name to "", wher Andrew> ADDRESS is, obviously, the actual address of the symfile in memory. These both seem fine to me. Andrew> I believe that this filename is only ever exposed in the output of Andrew> maintenance commands, so I haven't mentioned this change in the NEWS Andrew> file. Maybe I should though? I wouldn't bother. Tom