From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from qproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (qproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [66.147.248.250]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68C97388703A for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 16:29:14 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 68C97388703A Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tromey.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tromey.com Received: from outbound-ss-761.bluehost.com (outbound-ss-761.bluehost.com [74.220.211.250]) by qproxy4.mail.unifiedlayer.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BB588032CF8 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 16:29:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cmgw14.mail.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.0.90.129]) by progateway8.mail.pro1.eigbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45DDB100477A3 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 16:28:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id UWVunPI4d2s5dUWVvn6ScM; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 16:28:43 +0000 X-Authority-Reason: nr=8 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=BOh2EHcG c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6232103b a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:117 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:17 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=o8Y5sQTvuykA:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=Qbun_eYptAEA:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=1nBZhKvG-6WKvJG4cL8A:9 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References :Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=TbyJ1aGkovts8Mr9fVrFbz77ajrnXBq/DIuQ8lxA7Ro=; b=s28XchAfAh8CVtMJmN/mW8NpPR ugBnQRx7NfiqXCVxNvbpAcKQiEkJHmr9TylEyNpap9M830iPXShO6/L+icieUJmveU0WxthOoqv+M YWWQXvoUt28UzR+/bKGNV/5C+; Received: from 71-211-175-224.hlrn.qwest.net ([71.211.175.224]:37980 helo=murgatroyd) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1nUWVu-003TVx-HK; Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:28:42 -0600 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb: Remove support for S+core References: <20220315223154.6517-1-tom@tromey.com> <5835f3ee-9026-2b37-9bdd-e14aba0247d8@palves.net> X-Attribution: Tom Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 10:28:41 -0600 In-Reply-To: (Pedro Alves's message of "Wed, 16 Mar 2022 14:44:18 +0000") Message-ID: <87a6dpkgjq.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5379.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - sourceware.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tromey.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 71.211.175.224 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1nUWVu-003TVx-HK X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: 71-211-175-224.hlrn.qwest.net (murgatroyd) [71.211.175.224]:37980 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 2 X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTM3OS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3024.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 16:29:15 -0000 Pedro> I think we should just drop the whole score port, though. See here, from 2014 (!): gdb has warped my perspective so much that my first thought was that this seems kind of recent. Pedro> Like so. Given this has been removed from GCC for so long, and we never heard Pedro> of anyone using the port or file a bug report about it all these years, I think Pedro> we can just go ahead and delete it without a deprecation period. Agreed. Tom