From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17398 invoked by alias); 12 Feb 2014 16:56:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 17383 invoked by uid 89); 12 Feb 2014 16:56:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:56:45 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s1CGuhUs020552 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2014 11:56:44 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-148.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.148]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s1CGugqW020684 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 12 Feb 2014 11:56:42 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] remote.c: Use the ptid.lwp field to store remote thread ids rather than ptid.tid. References: <1392214020-21478-1-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> <1392214020-21478-2-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 16:56:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <1392214020-21478-2-git-send-email-palves@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Wed, 12 Feb 2014 14:06:59 +0000") Message-ID: <87a9dwuv5h.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2014-02/txt/msg00421.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> I believe that on the GDB side too, it's best that we standardize on Pedro> process_stratum targets using the ptid.lwp field to store thread ids. Pedro> The idea being leave the ptid.tid field free for any thread_stratum Pedro> target that might want to sit on top. Thanks for doing this. Pedro> Because remote.c is currently using ptid.tid, we can't make gdbserver Pedro> and gdb share bits of remote-specific code that manipulates ptids. Pedro reminded me that the functions in question are read_ptid and write_ptid. Tom