From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 94089 invoked by alias); 4 Sep 2018 18:04:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 94019 invoked by uid 89); 4 Sep 2018 18:04:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=inconveniences, life X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.73) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Sep 2018 18:04:21 +0000 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85D1FDFF3; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 18:04:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unused-10-15-17-196.yyz.redhat.com [10.15.17.196]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6810C202704B; Tue, 4 Sep 2018 18:04:20 +0000 (UTC) From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Jonah Graham Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, David Edelsohn Subject: Re: Proposal to revert the gnulib update patch References: <7a6dbc2fdb2323c35e981f93236f323e9d7c0b24-master-breakage@gdb-build> <87tvndm8je.fsf@redhat.com> <87a7p4lx9u.fsf@redhat.com> <87bm9kx3ht.fsf@tromey.com> <8736uwlura.fsf@redhat.com> <8736uwwucm.fsf@tromey.com> <87pny0k10s.fsf@redhat.com> <878t4mrssl.fsf@tromey.com> <87y3ciytr7.fsf_-_@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2018 18:04:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Jonah Graham's message of "Tue, 4 Sep 2018 07:19:52 +0100") Message-ID: <87bm9dyw9n.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2018-09/txt/msg00058.txt.bz2 On Tuesday, September 04 2018, Jonah Graham wrote: > On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 at 01:46, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> I'd like to hear your opinions. > > In the short term it would make my life easier. However at some point > c11 should be allowed for GDB source. If gdb maintainers want to make > that change now CDT will figure out how to manage. I absolutely agree we should be moving to more recent standards *and* compilers. My initial plan is to fix these two gnulib bugs, but I won't be fully available this week and don't want to cause inconveniences to other people who are compiling GDB with either an old compiler or on mingw. > I have put in a request to Eclipse Infrastructure to get a newer GCC > on our build machines already: > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=538538 Thanks, that is great. -- Sergio GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible http://sergiodj.net/