From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22249 invoked by alias); 19 May 2014 14:18:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22237 invoked by uid 89); 19 May 2014 14:18:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 19 May 2014 14:18:13 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s4JEIA0q021705 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 19 May 2014 10:18:11 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-182.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.182]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s4JEI9sd012524 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 19 May 2014 10:18:10 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH] GDB/testsuite: Bump up `match_max' References: Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 14:18:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Maciej W. Rozycki's message of "Sat, 17 May 2014 21:56:07 +0100") Message-ID: <87bnutzwbj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2014-05/txt/msg00346.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Maciej" == Maciej W Rozycki writes: Maciej> 2014-05-17 Maciej W. Rozycki Maciej> gdb/testsuite/ Maciej> * lib/gdb.exp (default_gdb_init): Bump `match_max' up from Maciej> 30000 to 65536. Ok. I wonder whether you timed the test suite? The expect man page says: This may be changed with the function match_max. (Note that excessively large values can slow down the pattern matcher.) If it is notably slower then it would be better to rewrite the macro tests to avoid this need. Tom