From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13439 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2013 21:50:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 13426 invoked by uid 89); 6 Nov 2013 21:50:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Nov 2013 21:50:23 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rA6LoAqr001112 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 6 Nov 2013 16:50:10 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-94.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.94]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rA6Lo6Hi019361 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 6 Nov 2013 16:50:07 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Keith Seitz Cc: Pierre Muller , "'gdb-patches'" Subject: Re: [RFC 6/6] Fix remaining failures in gdb.base/printcmds.exp for mingw hosts. References: <002901cebaf2$35ec65a0$a1c530e0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <003b01cebaf3$a2d79620$e886c260$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <524A2329.3030706@redhat.com> <000901cebeab$a83936d0$f8aba470$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <5266C330.1090101@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 21:53:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <5266C330.1090101@redhat.com> (Keith Seitz's message of "Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:25:52 -0700") Message-ID: <87bo1x19pu.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00156.txt.bz2 [ the mysterious C-v ] Keith> I say get rid of it. This is the only place where this is done, and if Keith> this is really necessary, there are several other places where it Keith> should have been done. So I'm assuming it is no longer strictly Keith> necessary. I think so as well. Tom