From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gproxy3-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy3-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.30.42]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02F7139960F8 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 19:51:52 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 02F7139960F8 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tromey.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tromey.com Received: from cmgw11.mail.unifiedlayer.com (unknown [10.0.90.126]) by progateway5.mail.pro1.eigbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66AA810102C1A for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 19:51:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id T7GtoCQ4UmB5LT7GtoyMKn; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 19:51:39 +0000 X-Authority-Reason: nr=8 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=MaSpB7zf c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=630e6a4b a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:117 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:17 a=dLZJa+xiwSxG16/P+YVxDGlgEgI=:19 a=biHskzXt2R4A:10:nop_rcvd_month_year a=Qbun_eYptAEA:10:endurance_base64_authed_username_1 a=CCpqsmhAAAAA:8 a=aiix0lYoz3QeRgvXDKQA:9 a=ul9cdbp4aOFLsgKbc677:22 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References :Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=DESItx6GhAhO72MpZUGyMoanSjQFFnzE9ShHnD8jN08=; b=SpZhE2puhBrt5QalZNQyl6eoNg QZp+o7EsPNEz8pq1vWgXwFrvq1AidIeYjDEae0qxcQmeawsCvD4qq1B6pe9ajemH9ZMfmuYiep6wT RaSKOlRtFukJTMcH+5HjvDfBp; Received: from 97-122-83-53.hlrn.qwest.net ([97.122.83.53]:56390 helo=murgatroyd) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1oT7Gs-002hwM-NB; Tue, 30 Aug 2022 13:51:38 -0600 From: Tom Tromey To: Nils-Christian Kempke via Gdb-patches Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] testsuite, fortran: adapt tests for ifort's 'start' behavior References: <20220610154500.374897-1-nils-christian.kempke@intel.com> <20220610154500.374897-4-nils-christian.kempke@intel.com> X-Attribution: Tom Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 13:51:37 -0600 In-Reply-To: <20220610154500.374897-4-nils-christian.kempke@intel.com> (Nils-Christian Kempke via Gdb-patches's message of "Fri, 10 Jun 2022 17:44:59 +0200") Message-ID: <87czcha4s6.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5379.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - sourceware.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tromey.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 97.122.83.53 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1oT7Gs-002hwM-NB X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: 97-122-83-53.hlrn.qwest.net (murgatroyd) [97.122.83.53]:56390 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 8 X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTM3OS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3022.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2022 19:51:53 -0000 >>>>> Nils-Christian Kempke via Gdb-patches writes: > -gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "First Breakpoint" > +# Ifort is already at this line after runto_main. > +if { ![test_compiler_info {ifort-*} f90] } { > + gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "First Breakpoint" > +} I suspect that in this particular test it would be more robust to simply run to this first breakpoint and not try to run to main. That way the test would be independent of where the compiler chooses to emit the 'main' entry point. Tom