From: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@adacore.com>
Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mask x86 segment registers in Windows gdbserver
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 11:51:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87edeemq5f.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wmt72tah.fsf@tromey.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Thu, 21 Dec 2023 13:29:42 -0700")
John> LGTM. Treating the x86 seg regs as 32-bits has required workarounds in
John> various places, but not easily fixable unfortunately.
Tom> Well, to my surprise, this patch caused regressions in our internal
Tom> tester.
Tom> It works again if I explicitly exclude the 'ss' register, like:
Tom> if (!windows_process.wow64_process)
Tom> return r >= AMD64_CS_REGNUM && r <= AMD64_GS_REGNUM && r != 19;
Tom> Now, this seems "ok" to do in some sense. However, I can't explain why
Tom> native gdb works fine, as it has the same logic in
Tom> amd64_windows_segment_register_p.
Tom> I'd welcome any thoughts you (or anybody) might have.
I finally figured it out. The Windows CONTEXT structure uses 16-bit
types for these registers' fields. So, gdbserver is actually
reading/writing past the end of the field here.
My patch correctly truncates the value, but the truncated value is
preserved and written back -- overwriting other fields in the thread
context.
I have a new patch that fixes this problem and some other related things
as well. I'll send it once it's been through a bit more testing.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-18 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-19 14:48 Tom Tromey
2023-12-20 22:03 ` John Baldwin
2023-12-21 20:29 ` Tom Tromey
2024-01-18 18:51 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2024-01-22 16:57 ` John Baldwin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87edeemq5f.fsf@tromey.com \
--to=tromey@adacore.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=jhb@FreeBSD.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).