public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
To: Joel Brobecker via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
	gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Subject: Re: GDB 12 branching next weekend (2022-03-20 or 2022-03-21)?
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 20:47:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ee31tyk7.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yi15T3HiZjGlLbWq@adacore.com>

Joel Brobecker via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:

> Hi everyone,
>
> Given the advancement on the two remaining items identified for
> the GDB 12 release, I think we can shoot for branching this coming
> weekend:
>
>         Sat/Sun March 20-21.
>
> If you guys see some issues with that, then please let us know.
> Otherwise, let's go for it!
>
> Cheers everyone.
>
> ---
>
> Fixed Since the Previous Update:
> --------------------------------
>
>   <none>
>
>
> Added Since the Last Update:
> ----------------------------
>
>   <none>
>
>
> Other Ongoing Items:
> --------------------
>
>   * TBC: [BarisA/AndrewB] <PR cli/28833>
>     Ctrl-D distorts GDB prompt
>     https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28833
>
>
>         Baris requested that we consider the bug above, which seems
>         to be a GDB 11 regression for Baris.
>
>         IIUC, Andrew fixed the issue in upstream's readline, and
>         now we just need to backport it.
>         https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-readline/2022-03/msg00005.html
>
>         Backport request on GDB ml:
>         https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-March/186391.html
>
>         There was a suggestion that we use a more limited bug safer
>         approach for GDB 12. I did not look at the patch, but if it
>         helps make people more comfortable, this seems like a valid
>         approach.

I've now pushed the more limited work around for this issue, which
should be good enough for GDB 12 (unless anyone wants to argue in favour
of the full fix making the release).

>
>   * [AndrewB] create GDB/MI commands using python
>
>         Explicit request to include in GDB 12; accepted as the patches
>         were sent prior to the start of the GDB 12 release process.
>
>         Latest version (v5) pasted by Andrew, and approved by Tom:
>         https://sourceware.org/pipermail/gdb-patches/2022-February/186176.html
>
>         Let's push the patch ;-).

This is now pushed.

Thanks,
Andrew


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-16 20:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-13  4:55 Joel Brobecker
2022-03-16 20:47 ` Andrew Burgess [this message]
2022-03-18  3:33   ` Joel Brobecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ee31tyk7.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=aburgess@redhat.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).